Clicky

Kodak M380 vs Samsung ST95

Portability
95
Imaging
33
Features
13
Overall
25
Kodak EasyShare M380 front
 
Samsung ST95 front
Portability
99
Imaging
39
Features
19
Overall
31

Kodak M380 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs

Kodak M380
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 38-190mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
  • Released January 2009
Samsung ST95
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Released January 2011
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Kodak M380 vs Samsung ST95 Overview

Here is a thorough overview of the Kodak M380 vs Samsung ST95, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Kodak and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the M380 (10MP) and ST95 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The M380 was unveiled 24 months before the ST95 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the M380 grades versus the ST95 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M380 over the Samsung ST95

 M380 ST95 

Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Kodak M380

 ST95 M380 
ReleasedJanuary 2011January 2009Fresher by 24 months
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Kodak M380 and Samsung ST95

 M380 ST95 
Manually focus No manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen size
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Kodak M380 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Kodak M380 has got outside measurements of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung ST95 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Check the Kodak M380 vs Samsung ST95 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the M380 compared to the ST95.

Kodak M380 vs Samsung ST95 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the M380 and ST95 is 95 and 99 respectively.

Kodak M380 vs Samsung ST95 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M380 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it's hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizing only by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the M380 and ST95.

Clearly, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Samsung ST95 to render extra detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures more aggressively. The older M380 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Kodak M380 vs Samsung ST95 sensor size comparison

Kodak M380 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M380 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M380 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung ST95 as a Portrait photography camera
19
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
30
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak M380
Street photography with Samsung ST95
47
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
more heavy than competition in class (155g)
50
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
low max ISO (0)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Kodak M380 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung ST95 as a Sports photography camera
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,448 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
27
megapixel count decent (16MP)
can't change focal length (()mm)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Kodak M380 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung ST95 as a Travel photography camera
50
built-in flash
missing Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition in class (155 grams)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (38mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
71
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
fast max aperture (f)
missing Timelapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak M380
Landscape photography with Samsung ST95
27
decent sized screen (3")
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (38mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
manual exposure not possible
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
missing Timelapse recording
38
fast max aperture (f)
pretty good screen size (3")
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
low max ISO (0)
doesn't have RAW format
missing Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M380 Vlogging features
Samsung ST95 Vlogging features
22
wide angle not the best (38mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external microphone port
more heavy than competition in class (155 grams)
27
fast max aperture (f)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing microphone socket
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Kodak M380 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M380 and Samsung ST95
 Kodak EasyShare M380Samsung ST95
General Information
Company Kodak Samsung
Model Kodak EasyShare M380 Samsung ST95
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2009-01-08 2011-01-19
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 80 -
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 25 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 38-190mm (5.0x) ()
Maximum aperture f/3.1-5.6 -
Macro focus range 10cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1448 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 2.50 m -
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off -
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155 gr (0.34 pounds) -
Physical dimensions 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7003 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal -
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $160 $145