Kodak M380 vs Sony TX200V
95 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Kodak M380 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-190mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak M380 vs Sony TX200V Overview
Lets look much closer at the Kodak M380 vs Sony TX200V, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the M380 (10MP) and TX200V (18MP) but they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe M380 was released 4 years earlier than the TX200V which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise overview of how the M380 grades vs the TX200V with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak M380 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare M380 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak M380 Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M380 over the Sony TX200V
| M380 | TX200V |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Kodak M380
| TX200V | M380 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 37 months |
| Display dimension | 3.3" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+1000k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Kodak M380 and Sony TX200V
| M380 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Kodak M380 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Kodak M380 has physical dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony TX200V has measurements of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak M380 vs Sony TX200V in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the M380 vs the TX200V.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the M380 and TX200V is 95 and 96 respectively.
Kodak M380 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading through technical specs. The picture underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the M380 and TX200V.
As you can tell, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Sony TX200V to resolve more detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged M380 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Kodak M380 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Kodak M380 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M380 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Sony |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare M380 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2012-01-30 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 38-190mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3.3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 1,230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1448 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.50 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lbs) | 129 grams (0.28 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 shots |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | KLIC-7003 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $160 | $500 |