Kodak M381 vs Olympus TG-860
95 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
91 Imaging
41 Features
42 Overall
41
Kodak M381 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
- 153g - 101 x 60 x 20mm
- Introduced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced February 2015
- Later Model is Olympus TG-870
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Kodak M381 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
Lets look closer at the Kodak M381 vs Olympus TG-860, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the M381 (12MP) and TG-860 (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe M381 was manufactured 6 years before the TG-860 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short overview of how the M381 scores versus the TG-860 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak M381 vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare M381 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The entire galleries are provided at Kodak M381 Gallery and Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M381 over the Olympus TG-860
| M381 | TG-860 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Kodak M381
| TG-860 | M381 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2015 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 67 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak M381 and Olympus TG-860
| M381 | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Kodak M381 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Kodak M381 offers outside dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 153 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Olympus TG-860 has measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Compare the Kodak M381 vs Olympus TG-860 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at the time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the M381 versus the TG-860.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M381 and TG-860 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Kodak M381 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes simply by reviewing technical specs. The pic here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the M381 and TG-860.
As you can tell, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should count on the Olympus TG-860 to deliver more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged M381 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Kodak M381 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Kodak M381 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M381 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare M381 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-07-29 | 2015-02-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-4.8 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 153 gr (0.34 pounds) | 224 gr (0.49 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | KLIC-7003 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $170 | $279 |