Clicky

Kodak M381 vs Olympus VG-120

Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
13
Overall
26
Kodak EasyShare M381 front
 
Olympus VG-120 front
Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
24
Overall
31

Kodak M381 vs Olympus VG-120 Key Specs

Kodak M381
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-175mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
  • 153g - 101 x 60 x 20mm
  • Launched July 2009
Olympus VG-120
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Released January 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Kodak M381 vs Olympus VG-120 Overview

Here, we will be comparing the Kodak M381 vs Olympus VG-120, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the M381 (12MP) and the VG-120 (14MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The M381 was manufactured 17 months prior to the VG-120 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a quick summary of how the M381 matches up versus the VG-120 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M381 over the Olympus VG-120

 M381 VG-120 

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Kodak M381

 VG-120 M381 
ReleasedJanuary 2011July 2009More recent by 17 months

Common features in the Kodak M381 and Olympus VG-120

 M381 VG-120 
Manually focus Lack of manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen size
Screen resolution230k230kExact same screen resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Kodak M381 vs Olympus VG-120 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Kodak M381 provides outside measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 153 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Olympus VG-120 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).

Examine the Kodak M381 vs Olympus VG-120 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the M381 versus the VG-120.

Kodak M381 vs Olympus VG-120 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the M381 and VG-120 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M381 vs Olympus VG-120 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M381 vs Olympus VG-120 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements simply by going through specifications. The photograph here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the M381 and VG-120.

Plainly, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can expect the Olympus VG-120 to provide greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older M381 will be behind in sensor technology.

Kodak M381 vs Olympus VG-120 sensor size comparison

Kodak M381 vs Olympus VG-120 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M381 vs Olympus VG-120 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M381 Portrait photography information
Olympus VG-120 Portrait photography information
21
manual focus not available
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
resolution not great (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
33
MP count decent (14MP)
includes face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Kodak M381 as a Street photography camera
Olympus VG-120 as a Street photography camera
47
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
more heavy than average in class (153g)
48
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Kodak M381 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus VG-120 as a Sports photography camera
17
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
26
MP count decent (14MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
low battery (160 CIPA)
no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Kodak M381 Travel photography information
Olympus VG-120 Travel photography information
50
flash built-in
does not have Timelapse mode
more heavy than average in class (153 grams)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
62
MP count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
really wide (26mm)
no Time Lapse recording
low battery (160 shots)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M381 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus VG-120 Landscape photography highlights
28
good sized screen (3 inch)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
no manual mode
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
36
really wide (26mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
MP count decent (14MP)
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
no manual exposure
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
low battery (160 per charge)
no Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak M381
Vlogging with Olympus VG-120
22
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have microphone support
more heavy than average in class (153 grams)
28
really wide (26mm)
includes face detection focusing
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external mic socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak M381 vs Olympus VG-120 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M381 and Olympus VG-120
 Kodak EasyShare M381Olympus VG-120
General Information
Company Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak EasyShare M381 Olympus VG-120
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Launched 2009-07-29 2011-01-06
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 64 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-175mm (5.0x) 26-130mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.0-4.8 f/2.8-6.5
Macro focus distance 10cm 7cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/1400s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.20 m 4.40 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 153g (0.34 lb) 120g (0.26 lb)
Physical dimensions 101 x 60 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 160 photos
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model KLIC-7003 LI-70B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC
Card slots Single Single
Launch price $170 $190