Clicky

Kodak M381 vs Samsung TL225

Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
13
Overall
26
Kodak EasyShare M381 front
 
Samsung TL225 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
33
Overall
34

Kodak M381 vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs

Kodak M381
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-175mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
  • 153g - 101 x 60 x 20mm
  • Introduced July 2009
Samsung TL225
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
  • Introduced August 2009
  • Alternate Name is ST550
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak M381 vs Samsung TL225 Overview

On this page, we will be analyzing the Kodak M381 vs Samsung TL225, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Kodak and Samsung. The image resolution of the M381 (12MP) and the TL225 (12MP) is relatively similar and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The M381 was announced about the same time to the TL225 which means that they are of a similar generation. The two cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the M381 matches up vs the TL225 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M381 over the Samsung TL225

 M381 TL225 

Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Kodak M381

 TL225 M381 
Screen dimensions3.5"3"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1152k230kCrisper screen (+922k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Kodak M381 and Samsung TL225

 M381 TL225 
IntroducedJuly 2009August 2009Similar generation
Manual focus Lack of manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Kodak M381 vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Kodak M381 offers physical measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 153 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL225 has proportions of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") along with a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).

Check the Kodak M381 vs Samsung TL225 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select during that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the M381 and the TL225.

Kodak M381 vs Samsung TL225 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the M381 and TL225 is 95 and 94 respectively.

Kodak M381 vs Samsung TL225 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M381 vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes just by reviewing technical specs. The pic underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the M381 and TL225.

As you can tell, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same MP therefore you should expect similar quality of photographs but you should really factor the release date of the products into consideration.

Kodak M381 vs Samsung TL225 sensor size comparison

Kodak M381 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M381 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M381 Portrait photography info
Samsung TL225 Portrait photography info
21
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
21
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Kodak M381 Street photography features
Samsung TL225 Street photography features
47
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
heavier than competition in class (153g)
59
has image stabilization (Optical)
has touch focus
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
heavier than competition in class (187 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak M381
Sports photography with Samsung TL225
17
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400s)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
27
has image stabilization (Optical)
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak M381
Travel photography with Samsung TL225
50
flash built-in
no Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (153 grams)
low MP (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
59
has touch focus
flash built-in
pretty wide (27mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (187 grams)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M381 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung TL225 as a Landscape photography camera
28
decent sized screen (3")
lack of manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not possible
lack of image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
no Time Lapse recording
37
pretty wide (27mm)
lovely big screen (3.5 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
focusing manually not possible
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not possible
sensor resolution low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M381 Vlogging highlights
Samsung TL225 Vlogging highlights
22
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
no mic jack
heavier than competition in class (153 grams)
29
pretty wide (27mm)
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have mic port
heavier than competition in class (187 grams)
Photography Glossary

Kodak M381 vs Samsung TL225 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M381 and Samsung TL225
 Kodak EasyShare M381Samsung TL225
General Information
Make Kodak Samsung
Model Kodak EasyShare M381 Samsung TL225
Other name - ST550
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2009-07-29 2009-08-13
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 64 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-175mm (5.0x) 27-124mm (4.6x)
Maximum aperture f/3.0-4.8 f/3.5-5.9
Macro focus range 10cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3.5"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 1,152 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds 8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.20 m 3.40 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 153g (0.34 pounds) 187g (0.41 pounds)
Physical dimensions 101 x 60 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7003 SLB-07A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch price $170 $488