Kodak M530 vs Olympus 6020
Portability
95 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
95 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Portability
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Kodak M530 vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
Kodak M530
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F) lens
- 150g - 94 x 57 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
Olympus 6020
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 6020
Photography Glossary Kodak M530 vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Following is a in depth analysis of the Kodak M530 versus Olympus 6020, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the M530 (12MP) and the 6020 (13MP) is relatively close and they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe M530 was announced within a month of the 6020 so they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise overview of how the M530 matches up versus the 6020 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak M530 vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare M530 and Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The whole galleries are viewable at Kodak M530 Gallery and Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M530 over the Olympus 6020
| M530 | 6020 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Kodak M530
| 6020 | M530 |
|---|
Common features in the Kodak M530 and Olympus 6020
| M530 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2010 |  | February 2010 | Same generation |
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical screen size |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Kodak M530 vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Kodak M530 provides outer measurements of 94mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Olympus 6020 has sizing of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Look at the Kodak M530 versus Olympus 6020 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the M530 versus the 6020.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the M530 and 6020 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Kodak M530 vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to envision the gap in sensor sizes only by viewing specifications. The pic underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the M530 and 6020.
To sum up, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Olympus 6020 to provide you with extra detail with its extra 1MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively.
Kodak M530 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Kodak M530 Portrait photography info
Olympus 6020 Portrait photography info
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
decent MP (13MP)
no manual focus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Kodak M530 as a Street photography camera
Olympus 6020 as a Street photography camera
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
max ISO too low (1,000)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
lighter than competition (122 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sports photography with Kodak M530
Sports photography with Olympus 6020
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (13 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
environment sealing
continuous shooting slow (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Kodak M530 Travel photography factors
Olympus 6020 Travel photography factors
built-in flash
very good maximum aperture (f)
lack of Timelapse mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (36mm)
lighter than competition (122 grams)
environment sealing
decent MP (13MP)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse mode
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.9)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Kodak M530 Landscape photography advice
Olympus 6020 Landscape photography advice
very good maximum aperture (f)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (36mm)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (1,000)
does not have RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (13MP)
environment sealing
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
no manual mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
no Time Lapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Kodak M530 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus 6020 as a Vlogging camera
very good maximum aperture (f)
wide angle not great (36mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of microphone port
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (122g)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external mic support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Kodak M530 vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M530 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare M530 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
| Also referred to as | - | mju Tough 6020 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-01-05 | 2010-02-02 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 13MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1000 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/8 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 150 gr (0.33 lb) | 122 gr (0.27 lb) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 57 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | KLIC-7006 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $110 | $279 |
