Clicky

Kodak M530 vs Olympus TG-4

Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
14
Overall
26
Kodak EasyShare M530 front
 
Olympus Tough TG-4 front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44

Kodak M530 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs

Kodak M530
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-108mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 94 x 57 x 23mm
  • Announced January 2010
Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
  • Introduced April 2015
  • Succeeded the Olympus TG-3
  • Later Model is Olympus TG-5
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak M530 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview

In this article, we will be looking at the Kodak M530 versus Olympus TG-4, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Kodak and Olympus. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the M530 (12MP) and TG-4 (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The M530 was revealed 6 years prior to the TG-4 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple summary of how the M530 grades vs the TG-4 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Kodak M530 over the Olympus TG-4

 M530 TG-4 

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Kodak M530

 TG-4 M530 
IntroducedApril 2015January 2010Fresher by 64 months
Focus manually Very exact focus
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Kodak M530 and Olympus TG-4

 M530 TG-4 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch screen Neither features Touch screen

Kodak M530 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Kodak M530 enjoys outside dimensions of 94mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-4 has proportions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).

Check the Kodak M530 versus Olympus TG-4 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the M530 vs the TG-4.

Kodak M530 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the M530 and TG-4 is 95 and 90 respectively.

Kodak M530 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M530 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing only by viewing technical specs. The photograph underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M530 and TG-4.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Olympus TG-4 to result in extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older M530 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Kodak M530 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison

Kodak M530 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M530 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M530 Portrait photography advice
Olympus TG-4 Portrait photography advice
20
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
46
focusing manually
decent MP (16MP)
has face detection focusing
delivers RAW formats
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Kodak M530 Street photography details
Olympus TG-4 Street photography details
47
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
maximum ISO low (1,000)
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
weather sealing
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
heavier than average in class (247g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Kodak M530 Sports photography highlights
Olympus TG-4 Sports photography highlights
17
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
47
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
weather sealing
good battery life (380 per charge)
continuous shooting slow (5.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak M530
Travel photography with Olympus TG-4
58
flash built-in
very good maximum aperture (f)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (36mm)
74
good battery life (380 CIPA)
weather sealing
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
heavier than average in class (247 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M530 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-4 as a Landscape photography camera
27
very good maximum aperture (f)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (36mm)
small screen (2.7")
manual exposure not available
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (1,000)
has no RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse mode
62
focusing manually
pretty wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
delivers RAW formats
weather sealing
good battery life (380 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not available
small sensor (1/2.3")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M530 Vlogging info
Olympus TG-4 Vlogging info
25
very good maximum aperture (f)
wide angle not good (36mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone port
34
pretty wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen is not selfie friendly
no external mic socket
heavier than average in class (247 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Kodak M530 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M530 and Olympus TG-4
 Kodak EasyShare M530Olympus Tough TG-4
General Information
Brand Kodak Olympus
Model type Kodak EasyShare M530 Olympus Tough TG-4
Type Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Announced 2010-01-05 2015-04-13
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic VII
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1000 6400
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 25
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-108mm (3.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.0-4.9
Macro focusing distance 10cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1/8s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate - 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.00 m 7.90 m (at ISO 1600)
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG H.264, Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 150 grams (0.33 lbs) 247 grams (0.54 lbs)
Dimensions 94 x 57 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 380 photographs
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID KLIC-7006 LI-92B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Card slots Single Single
Launch price $110 $379