Kodak M530 vs Olympus VR-330
95 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Kodak M530 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F) lens
- 150g - 94 x 57 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Old Model is Olympus VR-320
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak M530 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Following is a complete overview of the Kodak M530 and Olympus VR-330, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the M530 (12MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe M530 was unveiled 13 months earlier than the VR-330 making them a generation away from one another. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the M530 scores vs the VR-330 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak M530 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare M530 & Olympus VR-330. The full galleries are provided at Kodak M530 Gallery & Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M530 over the Olympus VR-330
| M530 | VR-330 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Kodak M530
| VR-330 | M530 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2011 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 13 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak M530 and Olympus VR-330
| M530 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Kodak M530 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Kodak M530 features outside dimensions of 94mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-330 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak M530 and Olympus VR-330 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the M530 and the VR-330.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M530 and VR-330 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Kodak M530 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes just by checking technical specs. The picture underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the M530 and VR-330.
As you can tell, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus VR-330 to give greater detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged M530 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Kodak M530 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Kodak M530 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M530 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare M530 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-01-05 | 2011-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1000 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/8 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 150 gr (0.33 lbs) | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 57 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | KLIC-7006 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $110 | $220 |