Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
95 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F) lens
- 150g - 94 x 57 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Kodak M530 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the M530 (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is very well matched but the M530 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") come with different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe M530 was launched 3 years earlier than the XZ-2 iHS and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the M530 scores vs the XZ-2 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare M530 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak M530 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M530 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| M530 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Kodak M530
| XZ-2 iHS | M530 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | December 2012 | January 2010 | More recent by 35 months | |
| Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Kodak M530 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| M530 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Kodak M530 offers exterior measurements of 94mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak M530 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is the front view size comparison of the M530 versus the XZ-2 iHS.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M530 and XZ-2 iHS is 95 and 85 respectively.
Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements only by checking technical specs. The visual underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the M530 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can tell, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact megapixel count but different sensor measurements. The M530 has got the tinier sensor which is going to make obtaining bokeh trickier. The older M530 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M530 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare M530 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-01-05 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1000 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/8 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 150g (0.33 lbs) | 346g (0.76 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 57 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 pictures |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | KLIC-7006 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $110 | $450 |