Clicky

Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS

Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26
Kodak EasyShare M530 front
 
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49

Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs

Kodak M530
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-108mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 94 x 57 x 23mm
  • Announced January 2010
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Released December 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview

Its time to examine more closely at the Kodak M530 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the M530 (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is very well matched but the M530 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") come with different sensor measurements.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The M530 was launched 3 years earlier than the XZ-2 iHS and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the M530 scores vs the XZ-2 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M530 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 M530 XZ-2 iHS 

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Kodak M530

 XZ-2 iHS M530 
ReleasedDecember 2012January 2010More recent by 35 months
Focus manually Very exact focusing
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Kodak M530 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 M530 XZ-2 iHS 
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Kodak M530 offers exterior measurements of 94mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).

Take a look at the Kodak M530 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is the front view size comparison of the M530 versus the XZ-2 iHS.

Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M530 and XZ-2 iHS is 95 and 85 respectively.

Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison

Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements only by checking technical specs. The visual underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the M530 and XZ-2 iHS.

As you can tell, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact megapixel count but different sensor measurements. The M530 has got the tinier sensor which is going to make obtaining bokeh trickier. The older M530 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison

Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M530 Portrait photography features
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography features
21
manual focus not available
no manual control
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
46
you can focus manually
features face detect focus
delivers RAW files
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak M530
Street photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
47
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
maximum ISO low (1,000)
66
screen tilts
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
heavier than average (346g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Kodak M530 Sports photography advice
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sports photography advice
17
low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
43
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features tracking focus
good battery life (340 CIPA)
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Kodak M530 Travel photography info
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography info
58
built-in flash
great max aperture (f)
no Timelapse recording
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
61
good battery life (340 CIPA)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
lack of Time Lapse function
heavier than average (346 grams)
megapixel count low (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M530 Landscape photography details
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography details
27
great max aperture (f)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (1,000)
no RAW support
no Timelapse recording
55
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
good battery life (340 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
lack of Time Lapse function
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M530 Vlogging info
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Vlogging info
25
great max aperture (f)
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
no microphone support
36
reasonably wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
includes mic port
screen isn't selfie friendly
heavier than average (346g)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M530 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
 Kodak EasyShare M530Olympus XZ-2 iHS
General Information
Make Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak EasyShare M530 Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2010-01-05 2012-12-18
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Max resolution 4000 x 3000 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 1000 12800
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points - 35
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 36-108mm (3.0x) 28-112mm (4.0x)
Max aperture - f/1.8-2.5
Macro focus distance 10cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1/8 seconds 60 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.00 m 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 150g (0.33 lbs) 346g (0.76 lbs)
Dimensions 94 x 57 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 49
DXO Color Depth score not tested 20.4
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.3
DXO Low light score not tested 216
Other
Battery life - 340 pictures
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery model KLIC-7006 Li-90B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $110 $450