Kodak M530 vs Samsung WB350F
95 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Kodak M530 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F) lens
- 150g - 94 x 57 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Introduced January 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak M530 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Kodak M530 and Samsung WB350F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Kodak and Samsung. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the M530 (12MP) and WB350F (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe M530 was manufactured 5 years before the WB350F which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short highlight of how the M530 grades versus the WB350F for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak M530 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare M530 & Samsung WB350F. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak M530 Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M530 over the Samsung WB350F
| M530 | WB350F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Kodak M530
| WB350F | M530 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 | January 2010 | More modern by 48 months | |
| Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Kodak M530 and Samsung WB350F
| M530 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Kodak M530 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you have to consider its weight and size. The Kodak M530 features physical measurements of 94mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has specifications of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak M530 and Samsung WB350F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the M530 against the WB350F.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the M530 and WB350F is 95 and 90 respectively.
Kodak M530 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes purely by reviewing technical specs. The image below might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the M530 and WB350F.
As you can tell, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Samsung WB350F to offer you extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged M530 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Kodak M530 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Kodak M530 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M530 | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare M530 | Samsung WB350F |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-01-05 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1000 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/8s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 150 gr (0.33 pounds) | 276 gr (0.61 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 57 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | KLIC-7006 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $110 | $260 |