Kodak M550 vs Kodak Z980
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
![Kodak EasyShare M550 front Kodak EasyShare M550 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-M550/Kodak-M550-front.jpg)
![Kodak EasyShare Z980 front Kodak EasyShare Z980 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Kodak-EasyShare-Z980.jpg)
68 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
Kodak M550 vs Kodak Z980 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 125g - 98 x 58 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Revealed January 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M550 vs Kodak Z980 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Kodak M550 and Kodak Z980, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are manufactured by Kodak. The resolution of the M550 (12MP) and the Z980 (12MP) is very comparable and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The M550 was released 13 months after the Z980 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple overview of how the M550 scores versus the Z980 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M550 vs Kodak Z980 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare M550 and Kodak EasyShare Z980. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak M550 Gallery and Kodak Z980 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M550 over the Kodak Z980
M550 | Z980 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2010 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 13 months |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 201k | Sharper display (+29k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the Kodak M550
Z980 | M550 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Kodak M550 and Kodak Z980
M550 | Z980 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Kodak M550 vs Kodak Z980 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Kodak M550 comes with outer measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z980 has specifications of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") and a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs).
Compare the Kodak M550 and Kodak Z980 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the M550 compared to the Z980.
![Kodak M550 vs Kodak Z980 size comparison Kodak M550 vs Kodak Z980 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M550-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Z980-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the M550 and Z980 is 95 and 68 respectively.
![Kodak M550 vs Kodak Z980 top view buttons comparison Kodak M550 vs Kodak Z980 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M550-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Z980-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak M550 vs Kodak Z980 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizes purely by going through technical specs. The image underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the M550 and Z980.
As you have seen, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same MP so you should expect comparable quality of photos though you need to take the release date of the cameras into account. The younger M550 provides an edge in sensor technology.
![Kodak M550 vs Kodak Z980 sensor size comparison Kodak M550 vs Kodak Z980 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M550-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Z980-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak M550 vs Kodak Z980 Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak M550 vs Kodak Z980 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak M550 vs Kodak Z980 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M550-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Z980-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M550 vs Kodak Z980 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M550 | Kodak EasyShare Z980 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Kodak | Kodak |
Model type | Kodak EasyShare M550 | Kodak EasyShare Z980 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-01-05 | 2009-01-05 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1000 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 201 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 16 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 6.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) | 445 gr (0.98 lbs) |
Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, double) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $119 | $249 |