Clicky

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-10

Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Kodak EasyShare M550 front
 
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front
Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
57
Overall
44

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs

Kodak M550
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1000
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 125g - 98 x 58 x 23mm
  • Launched January 2010
Olympus XZ-10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
  • 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Photography Glossary

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview

Here is a in-depth analysis of the Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-10, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the M550 (12MP) and the XZ-10 (12MP) is fairly comparable and they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The M550 was launched 4 years before the XZ-10 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the M550 grades vs the XZ-10 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

        

Reasons to pick Kodak M550 over the Olympus XZ-10

 M550 XZ-10 

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Kodak M550

 XZ-10 M550 
RevealedJanuary 2013January 2010Fresher by 37 months
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Kodak M550 and Olympus XZ-10

 M550 XZ-10 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Kodak M550 features physical dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-10 has specifications of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).

Compare the Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-10 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the M550 against the XZ-10.

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-10 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the M550 and XZ-10 is 95 and 91 respectively.

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-10 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, its difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizing just by checking out technical specs. The visual below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M550 and XZ-10.

As you can tell, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same resolution therefore you should expect comparable quality of photographs though you may want to factor the production date of the cameras into account. The older M550 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-10 sensor size comparison

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M550 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus XZ-10 Portrait photography highlights
21
lack of manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
45
manual focus
includes face detection focusing
saves RAW files
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Kodak M550 Street photography details
Olympus XZ-10 Street photography details
54
lighter than competitors in class (125g)
fixed screen
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
low max ISO (1,000)
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition in class (221g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Kodak M550 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus XZ-10 as a Sports photography camera
17
low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
34
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Kodak M550 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus XZ-10 as a Travel photography camera
67
lighter than competitors in class (125 grams)
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
no Time Lapse function
sensor resolution low (12MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
60
has built in flash
pretty wide (26mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (221g)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M550 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus XZ-10 Landscape photography highlights
31
decently wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
no manual control
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
low max ISO (1,000)
does not have RAW files
no Time Lapse function
53
manual focus
pretty wide (26mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak M550
Vlogging with Olympus XZ-10
31
decently wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
lighter than competitors in class (125 grams)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
no mic support
35
pretty wide (26mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone jack
more heavy than competition in class (221 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M550 and Olympus XZ-10
 Kodak EasyShare M550Olympus Stylus XZ-10
General Information
Company Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak EasyShare M550 Olympus Stylus XZ-10
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2010-01-05 2013-01-30
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 1000 6400
Min native ISO 64 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 35
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 26-130mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/1.8-2.7
Macro focus range 10cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/1400s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed - 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.50 m -
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 125 grams (0.28 lb) 221 grams (0.49 lb)
Dimensions 98 x 58 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 240 photos
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model KLIC-7006 Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, double) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Price at launch $119 $428