Kodak M550 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Kodak M550 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 125g - 98 x 58 x 23mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak M550 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Kodak M550 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the M550 (12MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is fairly comparable and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe M550 was brought out 3 years earlier than the TG-820 iHS and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the M550 matches up versus the TG-820 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak M550 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare M550 & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The entire galleries are available at Kodak M550 Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M550 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| M550 | TG-820 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Kodak M550
| TG-820 iHS | M550 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2012 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 25 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1030k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+800k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak M550 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| M550 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Kodak M550 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Kodak M550 features outer dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check the Kodak M550 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the M550 and the TG-820 iHS.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the M550 and TG-820 iHS is 95 and 92 respectively.
Kodak M550 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements purely by going through specs. The photograph here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the M550 and TG-820 iHS.
All in all, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same MP and you can expect comparable quality of photos however you have to take the launch date of the cameras into account. The older M550 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Kodak M550 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Kodak M550 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M550 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare M550 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-01-05 | 2012-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 1000 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,030k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lbs) | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | KLIC-7006 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, double) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $119 | $500 |