Clicky

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-1

Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Kodak EasyShare M550 front
 
Olympus XZ-1 front
Portability
88
Imaging
35
Features
51
Overall
41

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs

Kodak M550
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1000
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 125g - 98 x 58 x 23mm
  • Announced January 2010
Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Launched January 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview

Below is a in-depth comparison of the Kodak M550 versus Olympus XZ-1, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Kodak and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the M550 (12MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is very similar but the M550 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") possess totally different sensor sizing.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The M550 was released 12 months earlier than the XZ-1 so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the M550 scores vs the XZ-1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M550 over the Olympus XZ-1

 M550 XZ-1 

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Kodak M550

 XZ-1 M550 
LaunchedJanuary 2011January 2010More recent by 12 months
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution614k230kCrisper display (+384k dot)

Common features in the Kodak M550 and Olympus XZ-1

 M550 XZ-1 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Kodak M550 has got outer dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-1 has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).

Compare the Kodak M550 versus Olympus XZ-1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the M550 against the XZ-1.

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M550 and XZ-1 is 95 and 88 respectively.

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor measurements simply by going over a spec sheet. The visual here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the M550 and XZ-1.

Clearly, each of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M550 due to its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Kodak M550 will offer extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The older M550 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M550 Portrait photography info
Olympus XZ-1 Portrait photography info
21
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
45
focusing manually
supports face detect autofocus
supports RAW formats
low megapixels (10MP)
small sensor (1/1.63")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Kodak M550 Street photography features
Olympus XZ-1 Street photography features
54
lighter than average (125g)
no moving screen
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
low max ISO (1,000)
59
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/1.63")
more heavy than competitors in class (275 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Kodak M550 Sports photography info
Olympus XZ-1 Sports photography info
17
low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking focus
great battery pack (320 shots)
low fps (2.0 frames per second)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/1.63")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak M550
Travel photography with Olympus XZ-1
67
lighter than average (125 grams)
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f)
no Time Lapse function
low MP (12 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
62
great battery pack (320 per charge)
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors in class (275 grams)
low megapixels (10MP)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M550 Landscape photography advice
Olympus XZ-1 Landscape photography advice
31
decently wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f)
lack of manual focus
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
tiny screen (2.7")
no manual exposure
no image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
low max ISO (1,000)
does not have RAW format
no Time Lapse function
54
focusing manually
pretty wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
great battery pack (320 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
low megapixels (10MP)
small sensor (1/1.63")
lack of Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M550 Vlogging advice
Olympus XZ-1 Vlogging advice
31
decently wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f)
lighter than average (125 grams)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
no external mic jack
31
pretty wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
does not offer selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of microphone socket
more heavy than competitors in class (275g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M550 and Olympus XZ-1
 Kodak EasyShare M550Olympus XZ-1
General Information
Company Kodak Olympus
Model type Kodak EasyShare M550 Olympus XZ-1
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2010-01-05 2011-01-26
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic V
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.63"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 8.07 x 5.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 44.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4000 x 3000 3664 x 2752
Max native ISO 1000 6400
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 11
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28-112mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture - f/1.8-2.5
Macro focusing range 10cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dots 614k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech - OLED
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 30 secs 60 secs
Max shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate - 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.50 m 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 125 gr (0.28 pounds) 275 gr (0.61 pounds)
Dimensions 98 x 58 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 34
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 18.8
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.4
DXO Low light rating not tested 117
Other
Battery life - 320 images
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery ID KLIC-7006 Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, double) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Cost at release $119 $567