Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-1
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
![Kodak EasyShare M550 front Kodak EasyShare M550 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-M550/Kodak-M550-front.jpg)
![Olympus XZ-1 front Olympus XZ-1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-XZ-1/Olympus-XZ-1-front.jpg)
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 125g - 98 x 58 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Below is a in-depth comparison of the Kodak M550 versus Olympus XZ-1, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Kodak and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the M550 (12MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is very similar but the M550 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") possess totally different sensor sizing.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
The M550 was released 12 months earlier than the XZ-1 so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the M550 scores vs the XZ-1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare M550 & Olympus XZ-1. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak M550 Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M550 over the Olympus XZ-1
M550 | XZ-1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Kodak M550
XZ-1 | M550 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2011 | ![]() | January 2010 | More recent by 12 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak M550 and Olympus XZ-1
M550 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Kodak M550 has got outer dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-1 has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Compare the Kodak M550 versus Olympus XZ-1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the M550 against the XZ-1.
![Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M550-vs-Olympus-XZ-1-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M550 and XZ-1 is 95 and 88 respectively.
![Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M550-vs-Olympus-XZ-1-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor measurements simply by going over a spec sheet. The visual here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the M550 and XZ-1.
Clearly, each of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M550 due to its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Kodak M550 will offer extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The older M550 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
![Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M550-vs-Olympus-XZ-1-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M550-vs-Olympus-XZ-1-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M550 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M550 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Kodak | Olympus |
Model type | Kodak EasyShare M550 | Olympus XZ-1 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2010-01-05 | 2011-01-26 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3664 x 2752 |
Max native ISO | 1000 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 614k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 125 gr (0.28 pounds) | 275 gr (0.61 pounds) |
Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 34 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 117 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, double) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $119 | $567 |