Clicky

Kodak M550 vs Samsung SL202

Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Kodak EasyShare M550 front
 
Samsung SL202 front
Portability
94
Imaging
32
Features
17
Overall
26

Kodak M550 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs

Kodak M550
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1000
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 125g - 98 x 58 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2010
Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Released February 2009
  • Also Known as PL50
Photography Glossary

Kodak M550 vs Samsung SL202 Overview

Its time to take a more detailed look at the Kodak M550 and Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Kodak and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the M550 (12MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is very similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The M550 was released 11 months later than the SL202 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a simple summation of how the M550 scores versus the SL202 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Kodak M550 over the Samsung SL202

 M550 SL202 
ReleasedJanuary 2010February 2009Fresher by 11 months

Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Kodak M550

 SL202 M550 

Common features in the Kodak M550 and Samsung SL202

 M550 SL202 
Focus manually No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size2.7"2.7"Same display measurement
Display resolution230k230kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Kodak M550 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry your camera often, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Kodak M550 enjoys physical dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

Contrast the Kodak M550 and Samsung SL202 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the M550 vs the SL202.

Kodak M550 vs Samsung SL202 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the M550 and SL202 is 95 and 94 respectively.

Kodak M550 vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M550 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizing only by reviewing specs. The visual below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the M550 and SL202.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Kodak M550 to offer extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The more recent M550 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Kodak M550 vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison

Kodak M550 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M550 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Kodak M550
Portrait photography with Samsung SL202
21
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
24
provides face detection focus
manual focus not available
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Kodak M550 Street photography factors
Samsung SL202 Street photography factors
54
lighter than others in class (125 grams)
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
max ISO too low (1,000)
46
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Kodak M550 Sports photography advice
Samsung SL202 Sports photography advice
17
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400s)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
16
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Kodak M550 Travel photography factors
Samsung SL202 Travel photography factors
67
lighter than others in class (125g)
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
lack of Time Lapse mode
low megapixels (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
57
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M550 Landscape photography advice
Samsung SL202 Landscape photography advice
31
rather wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (1,000)
has no RAW support
lack of Time Lapse mode
26
reasonably wide (28mm)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak M550
Vlogging with Samsung SL202
31
rather wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
lighter than others in class (125 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external mic socket
27
reasonably wide (28mm)
provides face detection focus
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak M550 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M550 and Samsung SL202
 Kodak EasyShare M550Samsung SL202
General Information
Make Kodak Samsung
Model Kodak EasyShare M550 Samsung SL202
Also referred to as - PL50
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2010-01-05 2009-02-17
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4000 x 3000 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 1000 1600
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8-5.7
Macro focus range 10cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7" 2.7"
Screen resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 30 secs 8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/1500 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.50 m 4.60 m
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 125 gr (0.28 lb) 168 gr (0.37 lb)
Physical dimensions 98 x 58 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7006 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, double) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $119 $140