Kodak M550 vs Samsung WB35F
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c532d/c532d2c94a63bf44fa0e8cd9c6dd7f028438f940" alt="Kodak EasyShare M550 front Kodak EasyShare M550 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f91/52f9140fa7006285dc43ba7d1f1fb45d41f5684b" alt="Samsung WB35F front Samsung WB35F front"
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Kodak M550 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 125g - 98 x 58 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Kodak M550 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Let's look much closer at the Kodak M550 and Samsung WB35F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Kodak and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the M550 (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The M550 was announced 5 years earlier than the WB35F which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the M550 matches up against the WB35F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Kodak M550 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare M550 and Samsung WB35F. The whole galleries are viewable at Kodak M550 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M550 over the Samsung WB35F
M550 | WB35F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Kodak M550
WB35F | M550 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2010 | More modern by 48 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus |
Common features in the Kodak M550 and Samsung WB35F
M550 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical display dimensions |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Kodak M550 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Kodak M550 provides exterior dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has sizing of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Kodak M550 and Samsung WB35F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the M550 compared to the WB35F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e709/1e70948f1aa5df3545a26fc5e04353d4afce02a7" alt="Kodak M550 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison Kodak M550 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the M550 and WB35F is 95 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97abd/97abd4c640709a3e16334c3856151c0c7acf4771" alt="Kodak M550 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison Kodak M550 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison"
Kodak M550 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizes simply by looking through specs. The image below should provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M550 and WB35F.
All in all, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Samsung WB35F to render greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged M550 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2fa15/2fa151a927c8397ddc524cc2f160257ae313b443" alt="Kodak M550 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison Kodak M550 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison"
Kodak M550 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbad5/bbad5f6d24591a0c1c8b075b76ddc63f882b4fc4" alt="Kodak M550 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak M550 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Kodak M550 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M550 | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Kodak | Samsung |
Model type | Kodak EasyShare M550 | Samsung WB35F |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2010-01-05 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1000 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 125g (0.28 lbs) | 194g (0.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, double) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $119 | $130 |