Kodak M550 vs Sony WX500
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
![Kodak EasyShare M550 front Kodak EasyShare M550 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-M550/Kodak-M550-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-WX500/Sony-WX500-front.jpg)
91 Imaging
43 Features
56 Overall
48
Kodak M550 vs Sony WX500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 125g - 98 x 58 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 236g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Released April 2015
- Superseded the Sony WX350
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M550 vs Sony WX500 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Kodak M550 versus Sony WX500, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Kodak and Sony. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the M550 (12MP) and WX500 (18MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
The M550 was released 6 years earlier than the WX500 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summary of how the M550 matches up vs the WX500 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M550 vs Sony WX500 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare M550 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak M550 Gallery and Sony WX500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M550 over the Sony WX500
M550 | WX500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony WX500 over the Kodak M550
WX500 | M550 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2015 | ![]() | January 2010 | Newer by 64 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak M550 and Sony WX500
M550 | WX500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Kodak M550 vs Sony WX500 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Kodak M550 enjoys outer dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Sony WX500 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") along with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak M550 versus Sony WX500 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the M550 versus the WX500.
![Kodak M550 vs Sony WX500 size comparison Kodak M550 vs Sony WX500 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M550-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-WX500-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the M550 and WX500 is 95 and 91 respectively.
![Kodak M550 vs Sony WX500 top view buttons comparison Kodak M550 vs Sony WX500 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M550-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-WX500-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak M550 vs Sony WX500 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading a spec sheet. The picture here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the M550 and WX500.
As you can see, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Sony WX500 to offer you more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged M550 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
![Kodak M550 vs Sony WX500 sensor size comparison Kodak M550 vs Sony WX500 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M550-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-WX500-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak M550 vs Sony WX500 Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak M550 vs Sony WX500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak M550 vs Sony WX500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M550-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-WX500-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M550 vs Sony WX500 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M550 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Kodak | Sony |
Model type | Kodak EasyShare M550 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2010-01-05 | 2015-04-14 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 1000 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lbs) | 236 grams (0.52 lbs) |
Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, double) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $119 | $348 |