Clicky

Kodak M575 vs Nikon L32

Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
24
Overall
31
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
 
Nikon Coolpix L32 front
Portability
93
Imaging
46
Features
33
Overall
40

Kodak M575 vs Nikon L32 Key Specs

Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Launched January 2010
Nikon L32
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F3.2-6.5) lens
  • 164g - 95 x 60 x 29mm
  • Introduced January 2015
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Kodak M575 vs Nikon L32 Overview

Its time to look closer at the Kodak M575 vs Nikon L32, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals Kodak and Nikon. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the M575 (14MP) and L32 (20MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The M575 was released 6 years prior to the L32 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the M575 matches up vs the L32 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Nikon L32

 M575 L32 

Reasons to pick Nikon L32 over the Kodak M575

 L32 M575 
IntroducedJanuary 2015January 2010More recent by 61 months
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Kodak M575 and Nikon L32

 M575 L32 
Manually focus Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display sizing
Display resolution230k230kEqual display resolution
Touch display Neither provides Touch display

Kodak M575 vs Nikon L32 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Kodak M575 provides external dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Nikon L32 has specifications of 95mm x 60mm x 29mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).

Look at the Kodak M575 vs Nikon L32 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the M575 and the L32.

Kodak M575 vs Nikon L32 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M575 and L32 is 95 and 93 respectively.

Kodak M575 vs Nikon L32 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M575 vs Nikon L32 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements simply by going over specifications. The visual here may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the M575 and L32.

To sum up, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You should expect to see the Nikon L32 to offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older M575 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Kodak M575 vs Nikon L32 sensor size comparison

Kodak M575 vs Nikon L32 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M575 vs Nikon L32 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Kodak M575
Portrait photography with Nikon L32
28
megapixel count good (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
39
good resolution (20MP)
includes face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Kodak M575 Street photography details
Nikon L32 Street photography details
48
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
heavier than competition (152g)
max ISO too low (1,000)
56
has image stabilization (Digital)
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
heavier than competition (164g)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak M575
Sports photography with Nikon L32
26
megapixel count good (14MP)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
48
has image stabilization (Digital)
good resolution (20MP)
great battery pack (320 CIPA)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Kodak M575 Travel photography features
Nikon L32 Travel photography features
68
megapixel count good (14MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition (152g)
does not offer selfie friendly display
71
great battery pack (320 CIPA)
good resolution (20MP)
built-in flash
display is selfie friendly
quite wide (26mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (164g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M575 as a Landscape photography camera
Nikon L32 as a Landscape photography camera
40
decently wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
nice screen size (3 inch)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (1,000)
has no RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
48
quite wide (26mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Digital)
good resolution (20MP)
great battery pack (320 CIPA)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
no manual control
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
does not have Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M575 Vlogging highlights
Nikon L32 Vlogging highlights
28
decently wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
does not offer selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external mic socket
heavier than competition (152 grams)
66
quite wide (26mm)
display is selfie friendly
has image stabilization (Digital)
includes face detect focusing
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have mic socket
heavier than competition (164 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Kodak M575 vs Nikon L32 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M575 and Nikon L32
 Kodak EasyShare M575Nikon Coolpix L32
General Information
Make Kodak Nikon
Model type Kodak EasyShare M575 Nikon Coolpix L32
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Launched 2010-01-05 2015-01-14
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4288 x 3216 5152 x 3864
Maximum native ISO 1000 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 26-130mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.2-6.5
Macro focusing range 10cm 10cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.50 m 4.30 m
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off -
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 152g (0.34 pounds) 164g (0.36 pounds)
Physical dimensions 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 95 x 60 x 29mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 320 photographs
Battery type - AA
Battery ID KLIC-7006 2 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots One One
Cost at release $139 $120