Clicky

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S220

Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
24
Overall
31
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
 
Nikon Coolpix S220 front
Portability
97
Imaging
33
Features
11
Overall
24

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S220 Key Specs

Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Nikon S220
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 2000
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 100g - 90 x 56 x 18mm
  • Revealed February 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S220 Overview

Its time to take a deeper look at the Kodak M575 versus Nikon S220, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Kodak and Nikon. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the M575 (14MP) and S220 (10MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The M575 was brought out 12 months after the S220 and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief summary of how the M575 grades against the S220 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Nikon S220

 M575 S220 
RevealedJanuary 2010February 2009More modern by 12 months
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")

Reasons to pick Nikon S220 over the Kodak M575

 S220 M575 

Common features in the Kodak M575 and Nikon S220

 M575 S220 
Manually focus No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kEqual display resolution
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S220 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to carry around your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Kodak M575 provides outside measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Nikon S220 has sizing of 90mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs).

Take a look at the Kodak M575 versus Nikon S220 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the M575 compared to the S220.

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S220 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the M575 and S220 is 95 and 97 respectively.

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S220 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S220 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes just by seeing a spec sheet. The image here may offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the M575 and S220.

Clearly, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Kodak M575 to show extra detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The younger M575 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S220 sensor size comparison

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S220 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M575 Portrait photography highlights
Nikon S220 Portrait photography highlights
28
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
19
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Kodak M575 Street photography highlights
Nikon S220 Street photography highlights
48
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
heavier than others in class (152g)
low maximum ISO (1,000)
48
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Kodak M575 as a Sports photography camera
Nikon S220 as a Sports photography camera
26
MP count decent (14MP)
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
16
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak M575
Travel photography with Nikon S220
68
MP count decent (14MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than others in class (152g)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
52
has built in flash
missing Timelapse mode
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M575 Landscape photography factors
Nikon S220 Landscape photography factors
40
rather wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
pretty good screen size (3")
MP count decent (14MP)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not available
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (1,000)
no RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
22
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
small screen (2.5")
lack of manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
missing Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M575 as a Vlogging camera
Nikon S220 as a Vlogging camera
28
rather wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic jack
heavier than others in class (152 grams)
22
wide angle not good (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
missing microphone socket
Photography Glossary

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S220 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M575 and Nikon S220
 Kodak EasyShare M575Nikon Coolpix S220
General Information
Brand Kodak Nikon
Model Kodak EasyShare M575 Nikon Coolpix S220
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2010-01-05 2009-02-03
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4288 x 3216 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 1000 2000
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.1-5.9
Macro focus distance 10cm 10cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 2.5 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8 secs 8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate - 11.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.50 m -
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 152 grams (0.34 lb) 100 grams (0.22 lb)
Physical dimensions 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 90 x 56 x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7006 EN-EL10
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (3 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Pricing at release $139 $56