Kodak M575 vs Nikon S3000

Here, we are reviewing the Kodak M575 and Nikon S3000, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Kodak and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the M575 (14MP) and the S3000 (12MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The M575 was launched within a month of the S3000 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick view of how the M575 matches up against the S3000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare M575 and Nikon Coolpix S3000. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak M575 Gallery and Nikon S3000 Gallery.

If you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak M575 has external dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Nikon S3000 has proportions of 94mm x 56mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).

Analyze the Kodak M575 and Nikon S3000 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the M575 and the S3000.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the M575 and S3000 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Often, it is difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizes just by going through a spec sheet. The pic underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the M575 and S3000.

Clearly, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Kodak M575 to provide greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images way more aggressively.