Clicky

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S3700

Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
24
Overall
31
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
 
Nikon Coolpix S3700 front
Portability
96
Imaging
46
Features
32
Overall
40

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S3700 Key Specs

Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Launched January 2010
Nikon S3700
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-200mm (F3.7-6.6) lens
  • 118g - 96 x 58 x 20mm
  • Revealed January 2015
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S3700 Overview

In this write-up, we will be looking at the Kodak M575 vs Nikon S3700, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Kodak and Nikon. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the M575 (14MP) and S3700 (20MP) but they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The M575 was revealed 6 years before the S3700 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the M575 grades vs the S3700 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Nikon S3700

 M575 S3700 
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Nikon S3700 over the Kodak M575

 S3700 M575 
RevealedJanuary 2015January 2010More modern by 61 months

Common features in the Kodak M575 and Nikon S3700

 M575 S3700 
Manually focus No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kSame screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S3700 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Kodak M575 has got exterior measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Nikon S3700 has measurements of 96mm x 58mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 118 grams (0.26 lbs).

Analyze the Kodak M575 vs Nikon S3700 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the M575 compared to the S3700.

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S3700 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M575 and S3700 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S3700 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S3700 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes simply by reading specs. The picture here might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the M575 and S3700.

As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Nikon S3700 to offer greater detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged M575 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S3700 sensor size comparison

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S3700 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S3700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M575 Portrait photography info
Nikon S3700 Portrait photography info
28
MP count decent (14MP)
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
39
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
features face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Kodak M575 as a Street photography camera
Nikon S3700 as a Street photography camera
48
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
heavier than average (152 grams)
maximum ISO low (1,000)
59
image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Kodak M575 Sports photography information
Nikon S3700 Sports photography information
26
MP count decent (14MP)
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
51
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
better than average battery (240 shots)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Kodak M575 Travel photography advice
Nikon S3700 Travel photography advice
68
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than average (152 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
70
better than average battery (240 shots)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
flash built-in
really wide (25mm)
missing Time Lapse function
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.7)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M575 Landscape photography highlights
Nikon S3700 Landscape photography highlights
40
reasonably wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
MP count decent (14MP)
manual focus not available
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (1,000)
has no RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
44
really wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
better than average battery (240 per charge)
lack of manual focus
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.7)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
lack of manual exposure
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
missing Time Lapse function
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M575 Vlogging advice
Nikon S3700 Vlogging advice
28
reasonably wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external mic jack
heavier than average (152g)
32
really wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focusing
slow maximum aperture (f3.7)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external mic support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S3700 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M575 and Nikon S3700
 Kodak EasyShare M575Nikon Coolpix S3700
General Information
Manufacturer Kodak Nikon
Model type Kodak EasyShare M575 Nikon Coolpix S3700
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Launched 2010-01-05 2015-01-14
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip - Expeed C2
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 5152 x 3864
Highest native ISO 1000 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 25-200mm (8.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.7-6.6
Macro focusing distance 10cm 2cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 2.7"
Screen resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.50 m 2.80 m
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off -
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30p)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 152 grams (0.34 lb) 118 grams (0.26 lb)
Dimensions 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 96 x 58 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 240 pictures
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery ID KLIC-7006 EN-EL19
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $139 $175