Clicky

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S4000

Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
24
Overall
31
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
 
Nikon Coolpix S4000 front
Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S4000 Key Specs

Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Announced January 2010
Nikon S4000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 131g - 95 x 57 x 20mm
  • Announced February 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S4000 Overview

Here, we will be comparing the Kodak M575 and Nikon S4000, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals Kodak and Nikon. The image resolution of the M575 (14MP) and the S4000 (12MP) is pretty similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The M575 was brought out within a month of the S4000 and they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the M575 grades versus the S4000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Nikon S4000

 M575 S4000 

Reasons to pick Nikon S4000 over the Kodak M575

 S4000 M575 
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Kodak M575 and Nikon S4000

 M575 S4000 
AnnouncedJanuary 2010February 2010Similar age
Manual focus Lack of manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurements
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S4000 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Kodak M575 enjoys exterior dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Nikon S4000 has dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 131 grams (0.29 lbs).

Take a look at the Kodak M575 and Nikon S4000 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the M575 compared to the S4000.

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S4000 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M575 and S4000 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S4000 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S4000 Sensor Comparison

Normally, its hard to picture the difference between sensor measurements simply by going over specifications. The graphic below should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the M575 and S4000.

To sum up, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can expect the Kodak M575 to deliver greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots way more aggressively.

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S4000 sensor size comparison

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S4000 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S4000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M575 as a Portrait photography camera
Nikon S4000 as a Portrait photography camera
28
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
21
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
no external flash support
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Kodak M575 Street photography details
Nikon S4000 Street photography details
48
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
heavier than competitors (152 grams)
low max ISO (1,000)
48
no moving screen
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Kodak M575 Sports photography information
Nikon S4000 Sports photography information
26
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
17
low fps (3.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak M575
Travel photography with Nikon S4000
68
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
no Time Lapse recording
heavier than competitors (152 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
58
built-in flash
pretty wide (27mm)
missing Timelapse mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M575 as a Landscape photography camera
Nikon S4000 as a Landscape photography camera
40
reasonably wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
low max ISO (1,000)
lack of RAW support
no Time Lapse recording
32
pretty wide (27mm)
screen size is decent (3")
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
no manual mode
no image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
missing Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M575 Vlogging factors
Nikon S4000 Vlogging factors
28
reasonably wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
no mic socket
heavier than competitors (152g)
28
pretty wide (27mm)
touchscreen capability
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external microphone socket
Photography Glossary

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S4000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M575 and Nikon S4000
 Kodak EasyShare M575Nikon Coolpix S4000
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Nikon
Model Kodak EasyShare M575 Nikon Coolpix S4000
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2010-01-05 2010-02-03
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip - Expeed C2
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4288 x 3216 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 1000 3200
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 27-108mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.2-5.9
Macro focus range 10cm 8cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8s 8s
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.50 m -
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 152 gr (0.34 lb) 131 gr (0.29 lb)
Physical dimensions 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 95 x 57 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7006 EN-EL10
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $139 $200