Kodak M575 vs Nikon S7000
95 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
![Kodak EasyShare M575 front Kodak EasyShare M575 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-M575/Kodak-M575-front.jpg)
![Nikon Coolpix S7000 front Nikon Coolpix S7000 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S7000/Nikon-S7000-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
Kodak M575 vs Nikon S7000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 165g - 99 x 60 x 27mm
- Launched February 2015
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M575 vs Nikon S7000 Overview
Following is a in depth assessment of the Kodak M575 and Nikon S7000, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Kodak and Nikon. The resolution of the M575 (14MP) and the S7000 (16MP) is very comparable and both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The M575 was launched 6 years before the S7000 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the M575 matches up versus the S7000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M575 vs Nikon S7000 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare M575 & Nikon Coolpix S7000. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak M575 Gallery & Nikon S7000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Nikon S7000
M575 | S7000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S7000 over the Kodak M575
S7000 | M575 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | ![]() | January 2010 | More modern by 62 months |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak M575 and Nikon S7000
M575 | S7000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lack of Touch display |
Kodak M575 vs Nikon S7000 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Kodak M575 provides physical measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Nikon S7000 has measurements of 99mm x 60mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
See the Kodak M575 and Nikon S7000 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the M575 vs the S7000.
![Kodak M575 vs Nikon S7000 size comparison Kodak M575 vs Nikon S7000 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M575-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S7000-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M575 and S7000 is 95 and 94 respectively.
![Kodak M575 vs Nikon S7000 top view buttons comparison Kodak M575 vs Nikon S7000 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M575-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S7000-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak M575 vs Nikon S7000 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes simply by seeing specifications. The image below should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the M575 and S7000.
To sum up, both cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Nikon S7000 to provide extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged M575 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
![Kodak M575 vs Nikon S7000 sensor size comparison Kodak M575 vs Nikon S7000 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M575-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S7000-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak M575 vs Nikon S7000 Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak M575 vs Nikon S7000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak M575 vs Nikon S7000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M575-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S7000-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M575 vs Nikon S7000 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M575 | Nikon Coolpix S7000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Kodak | Nikon |
Model | Kodak EasyShare M575 | Nikon Coolpix S7000 |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2010-01-05 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1000 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.4-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 9.2 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 5.70 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 152g (0.34 pounds) | 165g (0.36 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 99 x 60 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 180 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | KLIC-7006 | EN-EL19 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $139 | $280 |