Kodak M575 vs Olympus FE-25
95 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
98 Imaging
32 Features
11 Overall
23
Kodak M575 vs Olympus FE-25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 0
- No Video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 62 x 24mm
- Revealed January 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak M575 vs Olympus FE-25 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Kodak M575 vs Olympus FE-25, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Kodak and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the M575 (14MP) and FE-25 (10MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe M575 was manufactured 13 months after the FE-25 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the M575 matches up vs the FE-25 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak M575 vs Olympus FE-25 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare M575 and Olympus FE-25. The entire galleries are available at Kodak M575 Gallery and Olympus FE-25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Olympus FE-25
| M575 | FE-25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2010 | January 2009 | Newer by 13 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 112k | Sharper screen (+118k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-25 over the Kodak M575
| FE-25 | M575 |
|---|
Common features in the Kodak M575 and Olympus FE-25
| M575 | FE-25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Kodak M575 vs Olympus FE-25 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Kodak M575 comes with physical measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Olympus FE-25 has proportions of 93mm x 62mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak M575 vs Olympus FE-25 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the M575 vs the FE-25.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M575 and FE-25 is 95 and 98 respectively.
Kodak M575 vs Olympus FE-25 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to see the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by looking at specs. The image below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the M575 and FE-25.
All in all, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Kodak M575 to resolve greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The younger M575 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Kodak M575 vs Olympus FE-25 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Kodak M575 vs Olympus FE-25 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M575 | Olympus FE-25 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare M575 | Olympus FE-25 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2010-01-05 | 2009-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2768 |
| Max native ISO | 1000 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | () |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.4 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 112k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 lbs) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 93 x 62 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | KLIC-7006 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $139 | $15 |