Clicky

Kodak M575 vs Olympus FE-25

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
24
Overall
31
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
 
Olympus FE-25 front
Portability
98
Imaging
32
Features
11
Overall
23

Kodak M575 vs Olympus FE-25 Key Specs

Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Launched January 2010
Olympus FE-25
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 0
  • No Video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 93 x 62 x 24mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak M575 vs Olympus FE-25 Overview

On this page, we will be reviewing the Kodak M575 vs Olympus FE-25, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Kodak and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the M575 (14MP) and FE-25 (10MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The M575 was manufactured 13 months after the FE-25 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the M575 matches up vs the FE-25 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Olympus FE-25

 M575 FE-25 
RevealedJanuary 2010January 2009Newer by 13 months
Screen dimensions3"2.4"Bigger screen (+0.6")
Screen resolution230k112kSharper screen (+118k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-25 over the Kodak M575

 FE-25 M575 

Common features in the Kodak M575 and Olympus FE-25

 M575 FE-25 
Manual focus No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither comes with Touch friendly screen

Kodak M575 vs Olympus FE-25 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Kodak M575 comes with physical measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Olympus FE-25 has proportions of 93mm x 62mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Take a look at the Kodak M575 vs Olympus FE-25 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the M575 vs the FE-25.

Kodak M575 vs Olympus FE-25 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M575 and FE-25 is 95 and 98 respectively.

Kodak M575 vs Olympus FE-25 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M575 vs Olympus FE-25 Sensor Comparison

Normally, its hard to see the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by looking at specs. The image below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the M575 and FE-25.

All in all, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Kodak M575 to resolve greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The younger M575 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Kodak M575 vs Olympus FE-25 sensor size comparison

Kodak M575 vs Olympus FE-25 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M575 vs Olympus FE-25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M575 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus FE-25 Portrait photography highlights
28
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
19
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Kodak M575 Street photography advice
Olympus FE-25 Street photography advice
48
no moving screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
heavier than competition in class (152 grams)
low maximum ISO (1,000)
48
fixed screen
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
maximum ISO low (0)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Kodak M575 Sports photography info
Olympus FE-25 Sports photography info
26
MP count decent (14MP)
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
16
focal length is fixed (()mm)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Kodak M575 Travel photography info
Olympus FE-25 Travel photography info
68
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (152 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
61
built-in flash
fast maximum aperture (f)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M575 Landscape photography information
Olympus FE-25 Landscape photography information
40
really wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
nice screen size (3 inches)
MP count decent (14MP)
no manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (1,000)
lack of RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
26
fast maximum aperture (f)
manual focus not available
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
screen is small (2.4 inches)
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (0)
does not have RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M575 Vlogging details
Olympus FE-25 Vlogging details
28
really wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic port
heavier than competition in class (152 grams)
9
can't record video
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Kodak M575 vs Olympus FE-25 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M575 and Olympus FE-25
 Kodak EasyShare M575Olympus FE-25
General Information
Company Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak EasyShare M575 Olympus FE-25
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Launched 2010-01-05 2009-01-07
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Max resolution 4288 x 3216 3648 x 2768
Max native ISO 1000 -
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) ()
Macro focus distance 10cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 2.4 inch
Screen resolution 230k dots 112k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.50 m -
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Max video resolution 1280x720 None
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 152 gr (0.34 lbs) -
Physical dimensions 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 93 x 62 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7006 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal -
Card slots Single Single
Price at release $139 $15