Clicky

Kodak M575 vs Olympus 5010

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
24
Overall
31
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
 
Olympus Stylus 5010 front
Portability
96
Imaging
36
Features
27
Overall
32

Kodak M575 vs Olympus 5010 Key Specs

Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Revealed January 2010
Olympus 5010
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 126g - 95 x 56 x 20mm
  • Launched January 2010
  • Also Known as mju 5010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak M575 vs Olympus 5010 Overview

Here is a in depth overview of the Kodak M575 vs Olympus 5010, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Kodak and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the M575 (14MP) and the 5010 (14MP) is very close and both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The M575 was unveiled at a similar time to the 5010 and they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the M575 scores versus the 5010 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Olympus 5010

 M575 5010 
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Olympus 5010 over the Kodak M575

 5010 M575 

Common features in the Kodak M575 and Olympus 5010

 M575 5010 
LaunchedJanuary 2010January 2010Same generation
Manually focus No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither features Touch friendly display

Kodak M575 vs Olympus 5010 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Kodak M575 enjoys physical measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Olympus 5010 has proportions of 95mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs).

Check the Kodak M575 vs Olympus 5010 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the M575 vs the 5010.

Kodak M575 vs Olympus 5010 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the M575 and 5010 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M575 vs Olympus 5010 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M575 vs Olympus 5010 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing purely by viewing specs. The graphic underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the M575 and 5010.

All in all, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact megapixels and you should expect comparable quality of photographs although you really should factor the release date of the cameras into account.

Kodak M575 vs Olympus 5010 sensor size comparison

Kodak M575 vs Olympus 5010 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M575 vs Olympus 5010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Kodak M575
Portrait photography with Olympus 5010
28
resolution is good (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
28
decent MP (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Kodak M575 Street photography details
Olympus 5010 Street photography details
48
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
heavier than competition (152g)
max ISO too low (1,000)
57
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Kodak M575 Sports photography advice
Olympus 5010 Sports photography advice
26
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
39
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Kodak M575 Travel photography features
Olympus 5010 Travel photography features
68
resolution is good (14MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (152 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
65
decent MP (14MP)
built-in flash
really wide (26mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak M575
Landscape photography with Olympus 5010
40
decently wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f)
good sized screen (3 inches)
resolution is good (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (1,000)
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
37
really wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7 inches)
no manual control
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
missing Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M575 Vlogging factors
Olympus 5010 Vlogging factors
28
decently wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external mic socket
heavier than competition (152 grams)
29
really wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing mic jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Kodak M575 vs Olympus 5010 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M575 and Olympus 5010
 Kodak EasyShare M575Olympus Stylus 5010
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak EasyShare M575 Olympus Stylus 5010
Also called - mju 5010
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Revealed 2010-01-05 2010-01-07
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4288 x 3216 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 1000 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 64
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 26-130mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8-6.5
Macro focus range 10cm 7cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed - 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.50 m 4.70 m
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 152 gr (0.34 lb) 126 gr (0.28 lb)
Physical dimensions 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 95 x 56 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7006 Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SC/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $139 $150