Clicky

Kodak M575 vs Olympus VG-110

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
24
Overall
31
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
 
Olympus VG-110 front
Portability
97
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29

Kodak M575 vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs

Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Launched January 2010
Olympus VG-110
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
  • Released February 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak M575 vs Olympus VG-110 Overview

Lets look a bit more in depth at the Kodak M575 vs Olympus VG-110, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the M575 (14MP) and the VG-110 (12MP) is pretty close and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The M575 was released 13 months prior to the VG-110 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief view of how the M575 scores vs the VG-110 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Olympus VG-110

 M575 VG-110 
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Kodak M575

 VG-110 M575 
ReleasedFebruary 2011January 2010Newer by 13 months

Common features in the Kodak M575 and Olympus VG-110

 M575 VG-110 
Manual focus Lack of manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kExact same screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch screen No Touch screen

Kodak M575 vs Olympus VG-110 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and measurements. The Kodak M575 offers external dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Olympus VG-110 has proportions of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).

Check out the Kodak M575 vs Olympus VG-110 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the M575 versus the VG-110.

Kodak M575 vs Olympus VG-110 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M575 and VG-110 is 95 and 97 respectively.

Kodak M575 vs Olympus VG-110 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M575 vs Olympus VG-110 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions simply by viewing technical specs. The picture below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the M575 and VG-110.

As you have seen, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You should expect the Kodak M575 to result in greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged M575 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Kodak M575 vs Olympus VG-110 sensor size comparison

Kodak M575 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M575 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M575 Portrait photography advice
Olympus VG-110 Portrait photography advice
28
decent MP (14MP)
no manual focus
manual mode not available
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
26
comes with face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
low MP (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak M575
Street photography with Olympus VG-110
48
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
more heavy than others in class (152 grams)
low maximum ISO (1,000)
48
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Kodak M575 Sports photography features
Olympus VG-110 Sports photography features
26
decent MP (14 megapixels)
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
24
comes with tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (170 CIPA)
no phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Kodak M575 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus VG-110 as a Travel photography camera
68
decent MP (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than others in class (152 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
57
built-in flash
fairly wide (27mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
terrible battery power (170 CIPA)
low MP (12 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.9)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M575 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus VG-110 as a Landscape photography camera
40
really wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f)
screen is a decent size (3")
decent MP (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not available
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (1,000)
has no RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
27
fairly wide (27mm)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
does not have image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
terrible battery power (170 per charge)
does not have Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M575 Vlogging highlights
Olympus VG-110 Vlogging highlights
28
really wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have microphone socket
more heavy than others in class (152g)
28
fairly wide (27mm)
comes with face detect focus
slow max aperture (f2.9)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have microphone support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Kodak M575 vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M575 and Olympus VG-110
 Kodak EasyShare M575Olympus VG-110
General Information
Manufacturer Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak EasyShare M575 Olympus VG-110
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Launched 2010-01-05 2011-02-08
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 1000 1600
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 27-108mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.9-6.5
Macro focus distance 10cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/1400s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.50 m 4.70 m
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 152 gr (0.34 lbs) 105 gr (0.23 lbs)
Dimensions 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 170 images
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model KLIC-7006 LI-70B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $139 $150