Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FP2
95 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
![Kodak EasyShare M575 front Kodak EasyShare M575 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-M575/Kodak-M575-front.jpg)
![Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FP2/Panasonic-FP2-front.jpg)
95 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FP2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 151g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FP2 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Kodak M575 versus Panasonic FP2, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Panasonic. The resolution of the M575 (14MP) and the FP2 (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The M575 was brought out about the same time to the FP2 which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple view of how the M575 grades against the FP2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FP2 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare M575 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2. The entire galleries are provided at Kodak M575 Gallery and Panasonic FP2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Panasonic FP2
M575 | FP2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP2 over the Kodak M575
FP2 | M575 |
---|
Common features in the Kodak M575 and Panasonic FP2
M575 | FP2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2010 | ![]() | January 2010 | Similar generation |
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FP2 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Kodak M575 comes with outer measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Panasonic FP2 has measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check out the Kodak M575 versus Panasonic FP2 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the M575 and the FP2.
![Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FP2 size comparison Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FP2 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M575-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FP2-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M575 and FP2 is 95 and 95 respectively.
![Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FP2 top view buttons comparison Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FP2 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M575-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FP2-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FP2 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions merely by going over specs. The pic below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the M575 and FP2.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same megapixels therefore you should expect similar quality of photos however you will need to take the release date of the products into consideration.
![Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FP2 sensor size comparison Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FP2 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M575-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FP2-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FP2 Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FP2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FP2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M575-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FP2-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FP2 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M575 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Kodak | Panasonic |
Model | Kodak EasyShare M575 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2010-01-05 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 1000 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.90 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 152 gr (0.34 lb) | 151 gr (0.33 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | KLIC-7006 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $139 | $80 |