Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FS42
95 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2027/c2027a9ccc68bbbd675c101327c04ce71c3d1bb8" alt="Kodak EasyShare M575 front Kodak EasyShare M575 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9979/f9979d6158b07faa33963a04f4938253f5f9ce99" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front"
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Increase to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Released April 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FS42, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Kodak and Panasonic. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the M575 (14MP) and FS42 (10MP) and the M575 (1/2.3") and FS42 (1/2.5") offer totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The M575 was announced 9 months later than the FS42 and they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the M575 matches up vs the FS42 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare M575 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak M575 Gallery & Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Panasonic FS42
M575 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2010 | ![]() | April 2009 | Fresher by 9 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Kodak M575
FS42 | M575 |
---|
Common features in the Kodak M575 and Panasonic FS42
M575 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | No Touch friendly display |
Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Kodak M575 has got exterior measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS42 has proportions of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Check out the Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FS42 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the M575 compared to the FS42.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9699d/9699d6aec4c5f0b6df9c5c051e01634a4f0e4c92" alt="Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the M575 and FS42 is 95 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f51a/3f51a369b1813f26d10b2288e62e6853232e28fc" alt="Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison"
Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to envision the difference between sensor sizing just by reading through specs. The photograph below will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the M575 and FS42.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The M575 with its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Kodak M575 will give more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The fresher M575 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46e8e/46e8e4feb5bd23f36360a99572d522b03b405218" alt="Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison"
Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06c06/06c061d7e42a446d4a06a8c90c708b2b57a4a978" alt="Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M575 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Kodak | Panasonic |
Model type | Kodak EasyShare M575 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2010-01-05 | 2009-04-17 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1000 | 1000 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 6.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 152g (0.34 lb) | 132g (0.29 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $139 | $580 |