Clicky

Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FS42

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
24
Overall
31
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front
Portability
95
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23

Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs

Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Panasonic FS42
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000 (Increase to 6400)
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
  • Released April 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview

On this page, we are comparing the Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FS42, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Kodak and Panasonic. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the M575 (14MP) and FS42 (10MP) and the M575 (1/2.3") and FS42 (1/2.5") offer totally different sensor measurements.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The M575 was announced 9 months later than the FS42 and they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the M575 matches up vs the FS42 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Panasonic FS42

 M575 FS42 
ReleasedJanuary 2010April 2009Fresher by 9 months
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")

Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Kodak M575

 FS42 M575 

Common features in the Kodak M575 and Panasonic FS42

 M575 FS42 
Manually focus Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kEqual display resolution
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly display No Touch friendly display

Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to carry your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Kodak M575 has got exterior measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS42 has proportions of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).

Check out the Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FS42 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the M575 compared to the FS42.

Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the M575 and FS42 is 95 and 95 respectively.

Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is hard to envision the difference between sensor sizing just by reading through specs. The photograph below will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the M575 and FS42.

As you can plainly see, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The M575 with its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Kodak M575 will give more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The fresher M575 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison

Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M575 Portrait photography highlights
Panasonic FS42 Portrait photography highlights
28
decent MP (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
19
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
low resolution (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
lack of RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak M575
Street photography with Panasonic FS42
48
fixed screen
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
more heavy than average in class (152 grams)
low max ISO (1,000)
47
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
lack of RAW files
maximum ISO low (1,000)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Kodak M575 Sports photography factors
Panasonic FS42 Sports photography factors
26
decent MP (14 megapixels)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400s)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
16
max frames per second very slow (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Kodak M575 Travel photography details
Panasonic FS42 Travel photography details
68
decent MP (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than average in class (152g)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
51
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse recording
low resolution (10 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
wide angle not the best (33mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M575 Landscape photography factors
Panasonic FS42 Landscape photography factors
40
reasonably wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
screen size is good (3 inch)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
no manual exposure
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
low max ISO (1,000)
lacks RAW support
no Timelapse recording
22
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (33mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inches)
lack of manual mode
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
maximum ISO low (1,000)
lack of RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak M575
Vlogging with Panasonic FS42
28
reasonably wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external microphone support
more heavy than average in class (152 grams)
22
wide angle not the best (33mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of microphone support
Photography Glossary

Kodak M575 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M575 and Panasonic FS42
 Kodak EasyShare M575Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42
General Information
Brand Kodak Panasonic
Model type Kodak EasyShare M575 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2010-01-05 2009-04-17
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.5"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4288 x 3216 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 1000 1000
Max boosted ISO - 6400
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 33-132mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing range 10cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 6.3
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 2.5"
Resolution of display 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8s 60s
Maximum shutter speed 1/1400s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate - 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.50 m 6.30 m
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 152g (0.34 lb) 132g (0.29 lb)
Physical dimensions 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID KLIC-7006 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Retail price $139 $580