Clicky

Kodak M575 vs Samsung SL620

Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
24
Overall
31
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
 
Samsung SL620 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
13
Overall
26

Kodak M575 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs

Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Announced January 2010
Samsung SL620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Released February 2009
  • Other Name is PL65
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak M575 vs Samsung SL620 Overview

Let's look much closer at the Kodak M575 versus Samsung SL620, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the M575 (14MP) and the SL620 (12MP) is very similar and both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The M575 was released 11 months after the SL620 and they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a short summary of how the M575 grades vs the SL620 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Samsung SL620

 M575 SL620 
ReleasedJanuary 2010February 2009Newer by 11 months
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Kodak M575

 SL620 M575 

Common features in the Kodak M575 and Samsung SL620

 M575 SL620 
Manual focus No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kIdentical display resolution
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Kodak M575 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to travel with your camera, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Kodak M575 has got external measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung SL620 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

Examine the Kodak M575 versus Samsung SL620 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the M575 and the SL620.

Kodak M575 vs Samsung SL620 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M575 and SL620 is 95 and 94 respectively.

Kodak M575 vs Samsung SL620 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M575 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its tough to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading specifications. The pic here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the M575 and SL620.

To sum up, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Kodak M575 to offer more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics more aggressively. The younger M575 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Kodak M575 vs Samsung SL620 sensor size comparison

Kodak M575 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M575 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M575 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung SL620 as a Portrait photography camera
28
megapixel count good (14MP)
manual focus not available
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
26
provides face detect focusing
no manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Kodak M575 Street photography advice
Samsung SL620 Street photography advice
48
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
more heavy than competition in class (152g)
maximum ISO low (1,000)
47
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
more heavy than competition (168g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Kodak M575 Sports photography info
Samsung SL620 Sports photography info
26
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400s)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
17
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Kodak M575 Travel photography details
Samsung SL620 Travel photography details
68
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
missing Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition in class (152g)
does not feature selfie friendly display
50
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition (168g)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M575 Landscape photography features
Samsung SL620 Landscape photography features
40
fairly wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
screen size is good (3 inch)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (1,000)
no RAW files
missing Timelapse mode
23
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M575 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung SL620 as a Vlogging camera
28
fairly wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
does not feature selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing microphone port
more heavy than competition in class (152g)
24
provides face detect focusing
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have microphone port
more heavy than competition (168g)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Kodak M575 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M575 and Samsung SL620
 Kodak EasyShare M575Samsung SL620
General Information
Company Kodak Samsung
Model type Kodak EasyShare M575 Samsung SL620
Also called - PL65
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2010-01-05 2009-02-17
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 1000 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 35-175mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8-5.7
Macro focusing distance 10cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 2.7"
Resolution of display 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 secs 8 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.50 m 4.60 m
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 152 grams (0.34 lb) 168 grams (0.37 lb)
Physical dimensions 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID KLIC-7006 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $139 $200