Clicky

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST93

Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
24
Overall
31
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
 
Samsung ST93 front
Portability
97
Imaging
39
Features
20
Overall
31

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST93 Key Specs

Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Released January 2010
Samsung ST93
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Revealed April 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST93 Overview

Below is a extended comparison of the Kodak M575 and Samsung ST93, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the M575 (14MP) and the ST93 (16MP) is very comparable and both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The M575 was manufactured 15 months prior to the ST93 making them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a simple summary of how the M575 matches up versus the ST93 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Samsung ST93

 M575 ST93 

Reasons to pick Samsung ST93 over the Kodak M575

 ST93 M575 
RevealedApril 2011January 2010More recent by 15 months
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Kodak M575 and Samsung ST93

 M575 ST93 
Focus manually Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display size
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither offers Touch friendly display

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST93 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Kodak M575 offers outside dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST93 has proportions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).

Compare the Kodak M575 and Samsung ST93 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the M575 against the ST93.

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST93 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the M575 and ST93 is 95 and 97 respectively.

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST93 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST93 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be difficult to see the contrast in sensor measurements just by checking out specs. The graphic below might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M575 and ST93.

As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Samsung ST93 to show more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older M575 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST93 sensor size comparison

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST93 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST93 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M575 Portrait photography factors
Samsung ST93 Portrait photography factors
28
decent MP (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
30
decent MP (16MP)
manual focus not available
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak M575
Street photography with Samsung ST93
48
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
heavier than competition in class (152g)
max ISO too low (1,000)
49
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Kodak M575 Sports photography factors
Samsung ST93 Sports photography factors
26
decent MP (14 megapixels)
low max shutter speed (1/1,400s)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
27
decent MP (16 megapixels)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Kodak M575 Travel photography highlights
Samsung ST93 Travel photography highlights
68
decent MP (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (152g)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
70
decent MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
great maximum aperture (f)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak M575
Landscape photography with Samsung ST93
40
rather wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
nice screen size (3 inch)
decent MP (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (1,000)
lacks RAW format
no Time Lapse mode
38
great maximum aperture (f)
pretty good screen size (3")
decent MP (16MP)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
manual mode not available
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak M575
Vlogging with Samsung ST93
28
rather wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external mic support
heavier than competition in class (152 grams)
27
great maximum aperture (f)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external mic support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST93 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M575 and Samsung ST93
 Kodak EasyShare M575Samsung ST93
General Information
Company Kodak Samsung
Model type Kodak EasyShare M575 Samsung ST93
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2010-01-05 2011-04-20
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Full resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1000 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) ()
Macro focusing range 10cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/1400s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.50 m -
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 152 gr (0.34 lb) 110 gr (0.24 lb)
Physical dimensions 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID KLIC-7006 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal -
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $139 -