Kodak M575 vs Samsung TL320
95 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
98 Imaging
35 Features
36 Overall
35
Kodak M575 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Alternate Name is WB1000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak M575 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Kodak M575 versus Samsung TL320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Kodak and Samsung. The resolution of the M575 (14MP) and the TL320 (12MP) is very well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe M575 was launched 11 months later than the TL320 so they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the M575 matches up against the TL320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak M575 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare M575 and Samsung TL320. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak M575 Gallery and Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Samsung TL320
| M575 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2010 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 11 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Kodak M575
| TL320 | M575 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak M575 and Samsung TL320
| M575 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Kodak M575 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Kodak M575 has got outside measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL320 has dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the Kodak M575 versus Samsung TL320 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the M575 vs the TL320.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the M575 and TL320 is 95 and 98 respectively.
Kodak M575 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements purely by checking specifications. The visual here should give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the M575 and TL320.
To sum up, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You should expect to see the Kodak M575 to resolve more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The fresher M575 should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Kodak M575 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observationsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segmentsLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Kodak M575 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M575 | Samsung TL320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare M575 | Samsung TL320 |
| Also Known as | - | WB1000 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2010-01-05 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1000 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 pounds) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $139 | $380 |
