Kodak M575 vs Sony TX200V
95 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Kodak M575 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Announced January 2012
Photography Glossary Kodak M575 vs Sony TX200V Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Kodak M575 versus Sony TX200V, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Kodak and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the M575 (14MP) and TX200V (18MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe M575 was brought out 3 years prior to the TX200V and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the M575 grades versus the TX200V in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak M575 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare M575 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak M575 Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Sony TX200V
| M575 | TX200V |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Kodak M575
| TX200V | M575 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 25 months |
| Display dimension | 3.3" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+1000k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Kodak M575 and Sony TX200V
| M575 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Kodak M575 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Kodak M575 enjoys physical dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony TX200V has sizing of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check out the Kodak M575 versus Sony TX200V in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the M575 and the TX200V.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the M575 and TX200V is 95 and 96 respectively.
Kodak M575 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizing simply by researching a spec sheet. The photograph underneath may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the M575 and TX200V.
Clearly, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Sony TX200V to provide you with more detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older M575 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Kodak M575 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Kodak M575 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M575 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Sony |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare M575 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-01-05 | 2012-01-30 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 18MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1000 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3.3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 lb) | 129 gr (0.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 photos |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $139 | $500 |
