Clicky

Kodak M575 vs Sony TX66

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
24
Overall
31
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 front
Portability
97
Imaging
42
Features
51
Overall
45

Kodak M575 vs Sony TX66 Key Specs

Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Sony TX66
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
  • 109g - 93 x 54 x 13mm
  • Launched February 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak M575 vs Sony TX66 Overview

Here is a in depth review of the Kodak M575 versus Sony TX66, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Kodak and Sony. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the M575 (14MP) and TX66 (18MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The M575 was revealed 3 years prior to the TX66 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the M575 scores versus the TX66 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Sony TX66

 M575 TX66 

Reasons to pick Sony TX66 over the Kodak M575

 TX66 M575 
LaunchedFebruary 2012January 2010Fresher by 26 months
Focus manually Dial accurate focus
Screen dimensions3.3"3"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1230k230kSharper screen (+1000k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Kodak M575 and Sony TX66

 M575 TX66 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Kodak M575 vs Sony TX66 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Kodak M575 offers outer dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony TX66 has measurements of 93mm x 54mm x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") with a weight of 109 grams (0.24 lbs).

Check out the Kodak M575 versus Sony TX66 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the M575 compared to the TX66.

Kodak M575 vs Sony TX66 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M575 and TX66 is 95 and 97 respectively.

Kodak M575 vs Sony TX66 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M575 vs Sony TX66 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing simply by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the M575 and TX66.

Clearly, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Sony TX66 to render greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The older M575 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Kodak M575 vs Sony TX66 sensor size comparison

Kodak M575 vs Sony TX66 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M575 vs Sony TX66 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M575 Portrait photography highlights
Sony TX66 Portrait photography highlights
28
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
42
focusing manually
decent MP (18MP)
features face detect focusing
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Kodak M575 Street photography features
Sony TX66 Street photography features
48
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
heavier than competition in class (152g)
low maximum ISO (1,000)
64
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with touch focus
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak M575
Sports photography with Sony TX66
26
megapixel count good (14MP)
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
49
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (18 megapixels)
features tracking focus
better than average battery power (250 shots)
no shutter priority
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Kodak M575 Travel photography information
Sony TX66 Travel photography information
68
megapixel count good (14MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (152 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
72
better than average battery power (250 CIPA)
comes with touch focus
decent MP (18MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (26mm)
lack of Timelapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak M575
Landscape photography with Sony TX66
40
fairly wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (1,000)
doesn't have RAW format
missing Time Lapse recording
51
focusing manually
pretty wide (26mm)
screen size is decent (3.3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (18 megapixels)
better than average battery power (250 shots)
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M575 Vlogging details
Sony TX66 Vlogging details
28
fairly wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external mic port
heavier than competition in class (152 grams)
36
pretty wide (26mm)
touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of microphone socket
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Kodak M575 vs Sony TX66 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M575 and Sony TX66
 Kodak EasyShare M575Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66
General Information
Company Kodak Sony
Model Kodak EasyShare M575 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2010-01-05 2012-02-28
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - BIONZ
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 18MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 4896 x 3672
Maximum native ISO 1000 12800
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 26-130mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.5-4.8
Macro focus distance 10cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3.3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 1,230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech - XtraFine TruBlack OLED display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate - 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.50 m 3.10 m
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 152 grams (0.34 lb) 109 grams (0.24 lb)
Physical dimensions 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 93 x 54 x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 250 shots
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model KLIC-7006 NP-BN
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo, microSD/microSDHC
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $139 $350