Clicky

Kodak M575 vs Sony W320

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
24
Overall
31
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front
Portability
97
Imaging
36
Features
21
Overall
30

Kodak M575 vs Sony W320 Key Specs

Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Launched January 2010
Sony W320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
  • Launched January 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak M575 vs Sony W320 Overview

Its time to examine more in depth at the Kodak M575 versus Sony W320, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Sony. The resolution of the M575 (14MP) and the W320 (14MP) is pretty close and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The M575 was released around the same time to the W320 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the M575 matches up vs the W320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

				

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Sony W320

 M575 W320 
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Kodak M575

 W320 M575 

Common features in the Kodak M575 and Sony W320

 M575 W320 
LaunchedJanuary 2010January 2010Same age
Focus manually Lack of manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kSame screen resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Kodak M575 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Kodak M575 has exterior dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony W320 has specifications of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") and a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

Check out the Kodak M575 versus Sony W320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the M575 versus the W320.

Kodak M575 vs Sony W320 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the M575 and W320 is 95 and 97 respectively.

Kodak M575 vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M575 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing merely by viewing specifications. The visual underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the M575 and W320.

To sum up, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same resolution therefore you can expect comparable quality of photos though you should really consider the launch date of the cameras into account.

Kodak M575 vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison

Kodak M575 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M575 vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M575 Portrait photography advice
Sony W320 Portrait photography advice
28
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
28
MP count good (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak M575
Street photography with Sony W320
48
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
heavier than competition in class (152g)
low maximum ISO (1,000)
48
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Kodak M575 Sports photography features
Sony W320 Sports photography features
26
resolution is good (14MP)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400s)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
26
MP count good (14 megapixels)
slow fps (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Kodak M575 Travel photography information
Sony W320 Travel photography information
68
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
no Time Lapse function
heavier than competition in class (152g)
display isn't selfie friendly
66
MP count good (14MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (26mm)
missing Time Lapse function
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak M575
Landscape photography with Sony W320
40
quite wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
nice screen size (3 inch)
resolution is good (14MP)
no manual focus
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual mode
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (1,000)
lacks RAW support
no Time Lapse function
33
quite wide (26mm)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not available
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
missing Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak M575
Vlogging with Sony W320
28
quite wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
no mic jack
heavier than competition in class (152g)
26
quite wide (26mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
missing mic jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak M575 vs Sony W320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M575 and Sony W320
 Kodak EasyShare M575Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
General Information
Company Kodak Sony
Model type Kodak EasyShare M575 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Launched 2010-01-05 2010-01-07
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4288 x 3216 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 1000 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 26-105mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.7-5.7
Macro focusing distance 10cm 4cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 2.7"
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8 secs 1 secs
Max shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shutter speed - 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.50 m 4.80 m
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 152 gr (0.34 lbs) 117 gr (0.26 lbs)
Dimensions 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID KLIC-7006 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Retail price $139 $269