Clicky

Kodak M575 vs Sony WX220

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
24
Overall
31
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 front
Portability
96
Imaging
43
Features
41
Overall
42

Kodak M575 vs Sony WX220 Key Specs

Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Sony WX220
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 121g - 92 x 52 x 22mm
  • Introduced February 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Kodak M575 vs Sony WX220 Overview

Below, we will be matching up the Kodak M575 vs Sony WX220, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Kodak and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the M575 (14MP) and WX220 (18MP) but they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The M575 was announced 5 years prior to the WX220 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the M575 grades versus the WX220 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Sony WX220

 M575 WX220 

Reasons to pick Sony WX220 over the Kodak M575

 WX220 M575 
IntroducedFebruary 2014January 2010More modern by 49 months
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Kodak M575 and Sony WX220

 M575 WX220 
Focus manually Lack of manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen sizing
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither features Touch friendly screen

Kodak M575 vs Sony WX220 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak M575 enjoys exterior measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony WX220 has proportions of 92mm x 52mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).

Analyze the Kodak M575 vs Sony WX220 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the M575 vs the WX220.

Kodak M575 vs Sony WX220 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the M575 and WX220 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M575 vs Sony WX220 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M575 vs Sony WX220 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the M575 and WX220.

As you can see, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Sony WX220 to deliver more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged M575 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Kodak M575 vs Sony WX220 sensor size comparison

Kodak M575 vs Sony WX220 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M575 vs Sony WX220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Kodak M575
Portrait photography with Sony WX220
28
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
37
MP count decent (18MP)
includes face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Kodak M575 Street photography info
Sony WX220 Street photography info
48
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
more heavy than competition (152 grams)
low maximum ISO (1,000)
59
has image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Kodak M575 Sports photography information
Sony WX220 Sports photography information
26
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
46
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (18MP)
includes tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Kodak M575 Travel photography details
Sony WX220 Travel photography details
68
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (152g)
screen is not selfie friendly
69
MP count decent (18 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (25mm)
great reach (250mm)
does not have Timelapse function
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M575 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony WX220 as a Landscape photography camera
40
reasonably wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not available
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (1,000)
no RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse function
44
really wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (18MP)
focusing manually not possible
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
lack of manual exposure
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M575 as a Vlogging camera
Sony WX220 as a Vlogging camera
28
reasonably wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have microphone port
more heavy than competition (152 grams)
34
really wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
does not have microphone support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak M575 vs Sony WX220 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M575 and Sony WX220
 Kodak EasyShare M575Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220
General Information
Manufacturer Kodak Sony
Model type Kodak EasyShare M575 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2010-01-05 2014-02-12
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor - Bionz X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 18 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4288 x 3216 4896 x 3672
Max native ISO 1000 12800
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 25-250mm (10.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.3-5.9
Macro focusing distance 10cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shooting rate - 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.50 m 3.70 m (with Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, on, slow synchro, off, advanced
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 152 grams (0.34 pounds) 121 grams (0.27 pounds)
Dimensions 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 92 x 52 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 210 photographs
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery ID KLIC-7006 NP-BN
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots One One
Launch price $139 $198