Kodak M580 vs Nikon S9300
90 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
![Kodak EasyShare M580 front Kodak EasyShare M580 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Kodak-EasyShare-M580.jpg)
![Nikon Coolpix S9300 front Nikon Coolpix S9300 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S9300/Nikon-S9300-front.jpg)
91 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Kodak M580 vs Nikon S9300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 59 x 56mm
- Revealed July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 215g - 109 x 62 x 31mm
- Announced July 2012
- Earlier Model is Nikon S9100
- Successor is Nikon S9500
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M580 vs Nikon S9300 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Kodak M580 and Nikon S9300, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Kodak and Nikon. The resolution of the M580 (14MP) and the S9300 (16MP) is very close and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
The M580 was announced 4 years before the S9300 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the M580 grades vs the S9300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M580 vs Nikon S9300 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare M580 and Nikon Coolpix S9300. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak M580 Gallery and Nikon S9300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M580 over the Nikon S9300
M580 | S9300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S9300 over the Kodak M580
S9300 | M580 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2012 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 36 months |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak M580 and Nikon S9300
M580 | S9300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Kodak M580 vs Nikon S9300 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Kodak M580 has got exterior measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Nikon S9300 has proportions of 109mm x 62mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Check the Kodak M580 and Nikon S9300 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the M580 compared to the S9300.
![Kodak M580 vs Nikon S9300 size comparison Kodak M580 vs Nikon S9300 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M580-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S9300-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M580 and S9300 is 90 and 91 respectively.
![Kodak M580 vs Nikon S9300 top view buttons comparison Kodak M580 vs Nikon S9300 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M580-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S9300-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak M580 vs Nikon S9300 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements just by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the M580 and S9300.
As you can see, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You should expect to see the Nikon S9300 to result in more detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older M580 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
![Kodak M580 vs Nikon S9300 sensor size comparison Kodak M580 vs Nikon S9300 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M580-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S9300-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak M580 vs Nikon S9300 Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak M580 vs Nikon S9300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak M580 vs Nikon S9300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M580-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S9300-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M580 vs Nikon S9300 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M580 | Nikon Coolpix S9300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Kodak | Nikon |
Model type | Kodak EasyShare M580 | Nikon Coolpix S9300 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-07-29 | 2012-07-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 4cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 6.9 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 150 grams (0.33 lb) | 215 grams (0.47 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") | 109 x 62 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 200 photos |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $169 | $249 |