Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FP2
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994ef/994ef7dee173aff9e3dc7d1b78984f0f0b8bbe9f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 front Olympus OM-D E-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13746/13746b655510dbf858df8e35d753589370ec8925" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 front"
95 Imaging
36 Features
17 Overall
28
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FP2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Launched October 2013
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 151g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
- Announced January 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FP2 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic FP2, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-M1 (16MP) and the FP2 (14MP) is pretty similar but the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and FP2 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-M1 was revealed 3 years after the FP2 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FP2 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the E-M1 grades versus the FP2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FP2 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 Gallery and Panasonic FP2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Panasonic FP2
E-M1 | FP2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2013 | ![]() | January 2010 | More modern by 47 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP2 over the Olympus E-M1
FP2 | E-M1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic FP2
E-M1 | FP2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FP2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 has got exterior measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") along with a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FP2 has measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic FP2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the E-M1 and the FP2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8defa/8defa6a9477a8b3d9ccc87a0f47d46d29d63dadb" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FP2 size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FP2 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 and FP2 is 71 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5b44/d5b44f744c7b0ee151712c7d2b167aca70ac9a4b" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FP2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FP2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FP2 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes only by going over technical specs. The picture here should offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 and FP2.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 using its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 will deliver greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 will have an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3715/f3715687e166cb5b4efcb2ae00a321f5d637db05" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FP2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FP2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FP2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9d54/e9d540d721afe1138d7e1352bf6accb0bb9ac4c1" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FP2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FP2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FP2 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2013-10-28 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePIC VII | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.90 m |
Flash settings | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/320 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 497g (1.10 lbs) | 151g (0.33 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 757 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $799 | $80 |