Kodak M580 vs Olympus Tough-3000
90 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cde9e/cde9ee5b80a8c1798d8162a92cef0f697a98cabf" alt="Kodak EasyShare M580 front Kodak EasyShare M580 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Kodak M580 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 59 x 56mm
- Launched July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Kodak M580 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Kodak M580 and Olympus Tough-3000, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the M580 (14MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is very close and they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The M580 was announced 5 months earlier than the Tough-3000 and they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summary of how the M580 scores against the Tough-3000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Kodak M580 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare M580 and Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The whole galleries are available at Kodak M580 Gallery and Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M580 over the Olympus Tough-3000
M580 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Kodak M580
Tough-3000 | M580 |
---|
Common features in the Kodak M580 and Olympus Tough-3000
M580 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2009 | ![]() | January 2010 | Same generation |
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither has Touch display |
Kodak M580 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Kodak M580 has outside dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Olympus Tough-3000 has dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Kodak M580 and Olympus Tough-3000 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the M580 against the Tough-3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6527/c65279c135779ac95679f554bad136c4b1c71dc7" alt="Kodak M580 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison Kodak M580 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M580 and Tough-3000 is 90 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb2d7/fb2d723a9efe168a890970b249fc23ac8d7a7522" alt="Kodak M580 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison Kodak M580 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison"
Kodak M580 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to envision the gap in sensor measurements just by viewing technical specs. The graphic underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the M580 and Tough-3000.
As you can tell, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Kodak M580 to result in extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9350/a935079c958ab7592d9f57c43e3b3d043d1ee066" alt="Kodak M580 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison Kodak M580 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison"
Kodak M580 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a254e/a254ea4305a5a58ef460f8742bf5192dedf094de" alt="Kodak M580 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak M580 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Kodak M580 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M580 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Kodak | Olympus |
Model type | Kodak EasyShare M580 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Otherwise known as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2009-07-29 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 150g (0.33 pounds) | 159g (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $169 | $0 |