Kodak M580 vs Olympus TG-320
90 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Kodak M580 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 59 x 56mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak M580 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Kodak M580 versus Olympus TG-320, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the M580 (14MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe M580 was revealed 3 years prior to the TG-320 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short view of how the M580 scores against the TG-320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak M580 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare M580 and Olympus TG-320. The full galleries are viewable at Kodak M580 Gallery and Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M580 over the Olympus TG-320
| M580 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Kodak M580
| TG-320 | M580 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 | July 2009 | Newer by 29 months |
Common features in the Kodak M580 and Olympus TG-320
| M580 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Kodak M580 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak M580 enjoys outside dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Olympus TG-320 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Kodak M580 versus Olympus TG-320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the M580 versus the TG-320.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the M580 and TG-320 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Kodak M580 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to see the gap in sensor dimensions merely by seeing a spec sheet. The image below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the M580 and TG-320.
As you can see, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same resolution therefore you should expect comparable quality of images although you have to factor the production date of the cameras into account. The more aged M580 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Kodak M580 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Kodak M580 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M580 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare M580 | Olympus TG-320 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-07-29 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 150 gr (0.33 pounds) | 155 gr (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 pictures |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $169 | $0 |