Kodak M580 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
90 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
Kodak M580 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 59 x 56mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
Photography Glossary Kodak M580 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Kodak M580 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the M580 (14MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is very close but the M580 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe M580 was unveiled 4 years earlier than the XZ-2 iHS and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summation of how the M580 scores versus the XZ-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak M580 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare M580 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are available at Kodak M580 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M580 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| M580 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Kodak M580
| XZ-2 iHS | M580 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | December 2012 | July 2009 | Fresher by 41 months | |
| Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Kodak M580 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| M580 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Kodak M580 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Kodak M580 has got outer dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Compare the Kodak M580 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the M580 versus the XZ-2 iHS.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M580 and XZ-2 iHS is 90 and 85 respectively.
Kodak M580 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing simply by looking through specifications. The graphic here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the M580 and XZ-2 iHS.
Plainly, the two cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The M580 with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Kodak M580 will provide you with extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The older M580 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Kodak M580 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Kodak M580 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M580 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare M580 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-07-29 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 60 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 150 grams (0.33 lbs) | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 photos |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $169 | $450 |