Kodak M580 vs Panasonic ZS35
90 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
89 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Kodak M580 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 59 x 56mm
- Introduced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Released January 2014
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS30
- Renewed by Panasonic ZS40
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak M580 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
In this write-up, we will be analyzing the Kodak M580 and Panasonic ZS35, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Kodak and Panasonic. The resolution of the M580 (14MP) and the ZS35 (16MP) is relatively similar and they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe M580 was launched 5 years prior to the ZS35 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the M580 scores vs the ZS35 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak M580 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare M580 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The complete galleries are available at Kodak M580 Gallery and Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M580 over the Panasonic ZS35
| M580 | ZS35 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Kodak M580
| ZS35 | M580 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 | July 2009 | More modern by 54 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak M580 and Panasonic ZS35
| M580 | ZS35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Kodak M580 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Kodak M580 has got physical measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS35 has sizing of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Check out the Kodak M580 and Panasonic ZS35 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the M580 vs the ZS35.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M580 and ZS35 is 90 and 89 respectively.
Kodak M580 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes purely by going over technical specs. The picture below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the M580 and ZS35.
As you have seen, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Panasonic ZS35 to deliver more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged M580 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Kodak M580 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Kodak M580 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M580 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Panasonic |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare M580 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
| Also called | - | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-07-29 | 2014-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 21 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 6.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 150g (0.33 lb) | 305g (0.67 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $169 | $300 |