Kodak M580 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS
90 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Kodak M580 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 59 x 56mm
- Introduced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Launched February 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak M580 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Kodak M580 versus Pentax WG-2 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Kodak and Pentax. The image resolution of the M580 (14MP) and the WG-2 GPS (16MP) is very similar and they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe M580 was announced 3 years before the WG-2 GPS which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summary of how the M580 grades vs the WG-2 GPS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak M580 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare M580 & Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak M580 Gallery & Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M580 over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
| M580 | WG-2 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Kodak M580
| WG-2 GPS | M580 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2012 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 30 months |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak M580 and Pentax WG-2 GPS
| M580 | WG-2 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Kodak M580 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Kodak M580 provides outside dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Pentax WG-2 GPS has sizing of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak M580 versus Pentax WG-2 GPS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that moment. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the M580 vs the WG-2 GPS.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M580 and WG-2 GPS is 90 and 91 respectively.
Kodak M580 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizes simply by reviewing technical specs. The pic below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the M580 and WG-2 GPS.
As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can expect to see the Pentax WG-2 GPS to offer you greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged M580 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Kodak M580 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Kodak M580 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M580 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Pentax |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare M580 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-07-29 | 2012-02-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 5.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 150 grams (0.33 lb) | 198 grams (0.44 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | KLIC-7006 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $169 | $300 |