Kodak M580 vs Ricoh WG-M1
90 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Kodak M580 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 59 x 56mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak M580 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Kodak M580 vs Ricoh WG-M1, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Kodak and Ricoh. The resolution of the M580 (14MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is fairly close and they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe M580 was released 6 years earlier than the WG-M1 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the M580 grades versus the WG-M1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak M580 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare M580 and Ricoh WG-M1. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak M580 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M580 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| M580 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Kodak M580
| WG-M1 | M580 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 62 months |
Common features in the Kodak M580 and Ricoh WG-M1
| M580 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Kodak M580 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Kodak M580 provides outside dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has sizing of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak M580 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the M580 versus the WG-M1.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the M580 and WG-M1 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Kodak M580 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions purely by viewing specifications. The pic underneath should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the M580 and WG-M1.
Plainly, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same resolution so you should expect comparable quality of pictures though you really should consider the production date of the cameras into account. The more aged M580 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Kodak M580 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Kodak M580 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M580 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare M580 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-07-29 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 115k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400s | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 150g (0.33 lb) | 190g (0.42 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 images |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | KLIC-7006 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $169 | $2,000 |