Kodak Mini vs Samsung TL240
97 Imaging
32 Features
13 Overall
24
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Kodak Mini vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-87mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
- 99g - 86 x 53 x 18mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
- Additionally referred to as ST5000
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak Mini vs Samsung TL240 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Kodak Mini and Samsung TL240, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Mini (10MP) and TL240 (14MP) and the Mini (1/3") and TL240 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Mini was revealed 13 months after the TL240 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the Mini matches up vs the TL240 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak Mini vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare Mini & Samsung TL240. The full galleries are provided at Kodak Mini Gallery & Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Mini over the Samsung TL240
| Mini | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Kodak Mini
| TL240 | Mini | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+1") |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Kodak Mini and Samsung TL240
| Mini | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Kodak Mini vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Mini enjoys outside dimensions of 86mm x 53mm x 18mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of 99 grams (0.22 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL240 has dimensions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Kodak Mini and Samsung TL240 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the Mini and the TL240.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Mini and TL240 is 97 and 95 respectively.
Kodak Mini vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizes only by going through specs. The pic here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Mini and TL240.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Mini having a smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Samsung TL240 will show extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher Mini will have a benefit in sensor technology.
Kodak Mini vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Kodak Mini vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Mini | Samsung TL240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Mini | Samsung TL240 |
| Also called | - | ST5000 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2011-01-04 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 4.8 x 3.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 17.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3640 x 2736 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Highest native ISO | 1000 | 4800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 29-87mm (3.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-4.8 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 7.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5" | 3.5" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 99 grams (0.22 lb) | 160 grams (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 86 x 53 x 18mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $100 | $171 |