Clicky

Kodak Mini vs Sony W320

Portability
97
Imaging
32
Features
13
Overall
24
Kodak EasyShare Mini front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front
Portability
97
Imaging
37
Features
21
Overall
30

Kodak Mini vs Sony W320 Key Specs

Kodak Mini
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1000
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 29-87mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
  • 99g - 86 x 53 x 18mm
  • Announced January 2011
Sony W320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
  • Announced January 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak Mini vs Sony W320 Overview

On this page, we are matching up the Kodak Mini versus Sony W320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals Kodak and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the Mini (10MP) and W320 (14MP) and the Mini (1/3") and W320 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Mini was announced 13 months later than the W320 making them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before delving into a full comparison, here is a short view of how the Mini scores against the W320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Mini over the Sony W320

 Mini W320 
AnnouncedJanuary 2011January 2010Fresher by 13 months

Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Kodak Mini

 W320 Mini 
Display dimensions2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")

Common features in the Kodak Mini and Sony W320

 Mini W320 
Focus manually No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kIdentical display resolution
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Absent Touch friendly display

Kodak Mini vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Kodak Mini offers exterior measurements of 86mm x 53mm x 18mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of 99 grams (0.22 lbs) while the Sony W320 has proportions of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

Check out the Kodak Mini versus Sony W320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the Mini vs the W320.

Kodak Mini vs Sony W320 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the Mini and W320 is 97 and 97 respectively.

Kodak Mini vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Mini vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizing just by reading specs. The graphic below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Mini and W320.

As you can plainly see, both cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Mini having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh tougher and the Sony W320 will deliver extra detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The younger Mini should have an edge in sensor technology.

Kodak Mini vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison

Kodak Mini vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Mini vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Mini Portrait photography factors
Sony W320 Portrait photography factors
24
provides face detection focus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/3")
does not have RAW files
28
MP count decent (14MP)
no manual focus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Kodak Mini Street photography info
Sony W320 Street photography info
48
no moving screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/3")
does not have RAW files
low max ISO (1,000)
49
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Kodak Mini Sports photography features
Sony W320 Sports photography features
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
26
MP count decent (14MP)
slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Kodak Mini as a Travel photography camera
Sony W320 as a Travel photography camera
51
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse mode
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
wide angle not great (29mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
66
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (26mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Mini Landscape photography information
Sony W320 Landscape photography information
22
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (29mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
screen is small (2.5 inch)
no manual control
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/3")
low max ISO (1,000)
does not have RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
33
pretty wide (26mm)
MP count decent (14MP)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
small screen (2.7 inches)
no manual mode
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Mini Vlogging details
Sony W320 Vlogging details
25
provides face detection focus
wide angle not great (29mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone jack
26
pretty wide (26mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of mic port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak Mini vs Sony W320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Mini and Sony W320
 Kodak EasyShare MiniSony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
General Information
Company Kodak Sony
Model Kodak EasyShare Mini Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2011-01-04 2010-01-07
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 4.8 x 3.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 17.3mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3640 x 2736 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 1000 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 29-87mm (3.0x) 26-105mm (4.0x)
Max aperture f/3.0-4.8 f/2.7-5.7
Macro focus range 5cm 4cm
Crop factor 7.5 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 secs 1 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.50 m 4.80 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 99g (0.22 lbs) 117g (0.26 lbs)
Physical dimensions 86 x 53 x 18mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7006 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $100 $269