Kodak Sport vs Nikon S5200
92 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
![Kodak EasyShare Sport front Kodak EasyShare Sport front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-Sport/Kodak-Sport-front.jpg)
![Nikon Coolpix S5200 front Nikon Coolpix S5200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S5200/Nikon-S5200-front.jpg)
95 Imaging
40 Features
26 Overall
34
Kodak Sport vs Nikon S5200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-156mm (F) lens
- 146g - 98 x 58 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Sport vs Nikon S5200 Overview
In this write-up, we will be contrasting the Kodak Sport and Nikon S5200, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Kodak and Nikon. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the Sport (12MP) and S5200 (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
The Sport was announced 3 years prior to the S5200 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a simple summary of how the Sport scores against the S5200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Sport vs Nikon S5200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Sport and Nikon Coolpix S5200. The whole galleries are viewable at Kodak Sport Gallery and Nikon S5200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Nikon S5200
Sport | S5200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S5200 over the Kodak Sport
S5200 | Sport | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2011 | More recent by 25 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 112k | Crisper screen (+348k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Sport and Nikon S5200
Sport | S5200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch screen |
Kodak Sport vs Nikon S5200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Kodak Sport provides physical dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Nikon S5200 has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check the Kodak Sport and Nikon S5200 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the Sport and the S5200.
![Kodak Sport vs Nikon S5200 size comparison Kodak Sport vs Nikon S5200 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Sport-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S5200-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Sport and S5200 is 92 and 95 respectively.
![Kodak Sport vs Nikon S5200 top view buttons comparison Kodak Sport vs Nikon S5200 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Sport-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S5200-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak Sport vs Nikon S5200 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements purely by reading specifications. The photograph below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Sport and S5200.
Plainly, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should expect the Nikon S5200 to deliver greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older Sport is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
![Kodak Sport vs Nikon S5200 sensor size comparison Kodak Sport vs Nikon S5200 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Sport-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S5200-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak Sport vs Nikon S5200 Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak Sport vs Nikon S5200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak Sport vs Nikon S5200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Sport-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S5200-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Sport vs Nikon S5200 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Sport | Nikon Coolpix S5200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Kodak | Nikon |
Model | Kodak EasyShare Sport | Nikon Coolpix S5200 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-01-04 | 2013-01-29 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1250 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | 26-156mm (6.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.4 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 112 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 175 gr (0.39 lbs) | 146 gr (0.32 lbs) |
Dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 98 x 58 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 160 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 2 x AA | EN-EL19 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $155 | $130 |