Clicky

Kodak Sport vs Olympus 6020

Portability
92
Imaging
36
Features
13
Overall
26
Kodak EasyShare Sport front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front
Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
32
Overall
34

Kodak Sport vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs

Kodak Sport
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1250
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35mm (F3.0) lens
  • 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
  • Introduced January 2011
Olympus 6020
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
  • Revealed February 2010
  • Other Name is mju Tough 6020
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras

Kodak Sport vs Olympus 6020 Overview

The following is a extensive assessment of the Kodak Sport versus Olympus 6020, both Waterproof digital cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the Sport (12MP) and the 6020 (13MP) is relatively well matched and they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

The Sport was brought out 12 months after the 6020 which means that they are of a similar generation. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a short overview of how the Sport scores versus the 6020 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Olympus 6020

 Sport 6020 
RevealedJanuary 2011February 2010Newer by 12 months

Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Kodak Sport

 6020 Sport 
Screen sizing2.7"2.4"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution230k112kClearer screen (+118k dot)

Common features in the Kodak Sport and Olympus 6020

 Sport 6020 
Manually focus Lack of manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Kodak Sport vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Sport has got outer dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus 6020 has dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).

Take a look at the Kodak Sport versus Olympus 6020 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the Sport versus the 6020.

Kodak Sport vs Olympus 6020 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Sport and 6020 is 92 and 95 respectively.

Kodak Sport vs Olympus 6020 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Sport vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very tough to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions only by checking specifications. The picture below will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Sport and 6020.

To sum up, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should count on the Olympus 6020 to give extra detail having its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The younger Sport should have an edge in sensor technology.

Kodak Sport vs Olympus 6020 sensor size comparison

Kodak Sport vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Sport vs Olympus 6020 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Sport Portrait photography factors
Olympus 6020 Portrait photography factors
27
offers face detect focus
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
MP count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
28
good MP (13MP)
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

Street Comparison

Kodak Sport Street photography highlights
Olympus 6020 Street photography highlights
52
environment proofing
no moving screen
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
low maximum ISO (1,250)
66
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
lighter than others (122g)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Sports Comparison

Kodak Sport as a Sports photography camera
Olympus 6020 as a Sports photography camera
24
environment proofing
fixed focal length (35mm)
low max shutter speed (1/1,400s)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
MP count low (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
43
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (13 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
environment sealing
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Travel Comparison

Kodak Sport Travel photography info
Olympus 6020 Travel photography info
57
environment proofing
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse function
MP count low (12MP)
does not feature selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.0)
70
lighter than others (122 grams)
environment sealing
good MP (13 megapixels)
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse recording
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Sport Landscape photography highlights
Olympus 6020 Landscape photography highlights
27
environment proofing
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
tiny screen (2.4")
manual mode not possible
no image stabilization
MP count low (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (1,250)
has no RAW files
lack of Time Lapse function
40
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (13 megapixels)
environment sealing
lack of manual focus
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
missing Timelapse recording
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Sport Vlogging info
Olympus 6020 Vlogging info
25
offers face detect focus
slow max aperture (f3.0)
does not feature selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of mic port
31
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (122 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone support
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation

Kodak Sport vs Olympus 6020 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Sport and Olympus 6020
 Kodak EasyShare SportOlympus Stylus Tough 6020
General Information
Brand Kodak Olympus
Model type Kodak EasyShare Sport Olympus Stylus Tough 6020
Alternative name - mju Tough 6020
Type Waterproof Waterproof
Introduced 2011-01-04 2010-02-02
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 13MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 1250 1600
Min native ISO 80 64
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35mm (1x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.0 f/3.9-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.4 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 112 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 seconds 1/4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) 4.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 175g (0.39 lb) 122g (0.27 lb)
Dimensions 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID 2 x AA Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Retail price $155 $279