Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-860
92 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-870
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
Let's look closer at the Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-860, both Waterproof cameras by rivals Kodak and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the Sport (12MP) and TG-860 (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Sport was launched 5 years before the TG-860 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Kodak Sport being a Compact camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the Sport grades vs the TG-860 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare Sport & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak Sport Gallery & Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Olympus TG-860
| Sport | TG-860 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Kodak Sport
| TG-860 | Sport | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2015 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 49 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.6") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 112k | Clearer display (+348k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Sport and Olympus TG-860
| Sport | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera, you should factor its weight and size. The Kodak Sport has got exterior measurements of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-860 has specifications of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Examine the Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-860 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the Sport compared to the TG-860.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Sport and TG-860 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions just by checking out technical specs. The pic here will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Sport and TG-860.
As you have seen, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-860 to provide extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The more aged Sport will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Sport | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Sport | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2011-01-04 | 2015-02-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1250 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35mm (1x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 2.4 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 112k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 7.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175g (0.39 lb) | 224g (0.49 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $155 | $279 |