Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-320
92 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Below is a in-depth analysis of the Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-320, both Waterproof cameras by brands Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the Sport (12MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is very close and both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Sport was introduced 12 months earlier than the TG-320 so they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the Sport grades versus the TG-320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare Sport and Olympus TG-320. The whole galleries are available at Kodak Sport Gallery and Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Olympus TG-320
| Sport | TG-320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Kodak Sport
| TG-320 | Sport | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 | January 2011 | More recent by 12 months | |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 112k | Crisper display (+118k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Sport and Olympus TG-320
| Sport | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Kodak Sport provides external dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check the Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the Sport against the TG-320.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the Sport and TG-320 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to see the gap in sensor measurements just by viewing specifications. The photograph below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Sport and TG-320.
Plainly, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-320 to provide you with greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older Sport will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Sport | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Sport | Olympus TG-320 |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2011-01-04 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1250 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.4" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 112k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175 gr (0.39 lbs) | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $155 | $0 |