Kodak Sport vs Olympus VH-515
92 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
95 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
Kodak Sport vs Olympus VH-515 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Released August 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak Sport vs Olympus VH-515 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Kodak Sport versus Olympus VH-515, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the Sport (12MP) and the VH-515 (12MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Sport was manufactured 19 months earlier than the VH-515 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the Sport matches up against the VH-515 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak Sport vs Olympus VH-515 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Sport & Olympus VH-515. The entire galleries are available at Kodak Sport Gallery & Olympus VH-515 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Olympus VH-515
| Sport | VH-515 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Kodak Sport
| VH-515 | Sport | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2012 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 19 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 112k | Sharper screen (+348k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Kodak Sport and Olympus VH-515
| Sport | VH-515 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Kodak Sport vs Olympus VH-515 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Sport has got physical dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Olympus VH-515 has dimensions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak Sport versus Olympus VH-515 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the Sport and the VH-515.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the Sport and VH-515 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Kodak Sport vs Olympus VH-515 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to picture the difference in sensor sizing only by seeing specs. The photograph underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Sport and VH-515.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact MP so you can expect comparable quality of photos however you need to consider the age of the cameras into account. The older Sport will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Kodak Sport vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Kodak Sport vs Olympus VH-515 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Sport | Olympus VH-515 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Sport | Olympus VH-515 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2011-01-04 | 2012-08-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1250 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.4 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 112 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175 grams (0.39 lb) | 152 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 2 x AA | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $155 | $648 |